causticus: trees (Default)
There were some interesting discussions on yesterday's Magic Monday post and on the past month's or so posts on the Ecosophia blog regarding the collapse of alternative spirituality in the West and a likely impending cultural backlash against decades of general rot and grubbiness that is decaying our civilization from within.

Some of us here in the US are afraid that a sudden cultural jolt in the other direction, away from leftism/progressivism, will result in any type of spirituality that doesn't fit a narrow, literalist Christian/Abrahamic format as being seen by the reaction mob as "part of the problem." Anything the people leading and directing this backlash deem to be adjacent to the aforementioned cultural rot will be lazily lumped together into one big, bad conspiracy against what they believe they are trying to save and preserve. This likely means anything occult/esoteric, overtly pagan, or too foreign will be included, with very little nuance. As we know, the moral collapse of both Neopaganism and the postmodern occult scene hasn't helped matters at all in this respect, especially in light of recent tragic events.

Anyway, I want to know what anyone else here thinks of this and anything in your own area (US or somewhere else) you have seen indicative of a new cultural direction that may or or may not involve the condemnation of the things I listed above (or anything else that comes to mind). Also, we could use this space to think up ideas on how to preserve and carry on various spiritual teachings and practices if/when an intolerant religious climate becomes reality.

This is an open post that will stay open for quite a long time.
causticus: trees (Default)
I honestly have no idea what the next spiritual paradigm is going to look like, as far as its core teachings, practices, and aesthetic themes are concerned. In general, making accurate predictions about the future is not one of my gifts. But I do think that any astute observer of history and the human condition can spot trend and patterns and get a general sense of which direction the wind might start blowing tomorrow.

One thing I have seen brewing is the vigorous rejection of nearly everything the Baby Boomer generation stood for, metaphysically, politically, and aesthetically. I’m not going to lay out a laundry list of every misdeed and act of stupidity that can be plausibly pinned on the boomers; such would be the thing of an entire book (or encyclopedic set of volumes!), and there have already been plenty of authors and commentators who have thoroughly covered that topic anyway.

If I’m to offer up a listicle of any sort, it would consist of a few hypothetical trends that might become features of the next spiritual wave. Let’s take a hack at this:

1. So many of the boomers like to believe “hey, we’re all the same, maaaan.” (Not) sorry to say, but we may soon see a rejection of many egalitarian (particularly, blank-slatist) ideas about human nature and the human spiritual condition, and a subsequent return to hierarchical cosmo-theologies and observation-based takes on the human condition. For Christians, this simply means a return to long-established doctrines like original sin, or at least recognition that humanity is mostly alienated from higher spiritual truths. In some corners of present-day occultism and philosophy, there seems to be a much-needed return to recognizing the Platonic tradition as being both fundamental and essential to Western Spirituality. Notice that in boomer Neo-occultism, and in New Age, and Neopagan movements, Platonic metaphysics barely gets a nod, since Platonic cosmology is rather hierarchical and rightly notates humanity’s humble place in the grand cosmological scheme of things. This is because spiritual boomers by and large are Luciferians who worship their own egos. It’s no wonder that in boomer occultism, metaphysical miscreants and dabblers like Aleister Crowley and Gerald Gardner got all sorts of airtime, while serious teachers like Dion Fortune and Manly P. Hall were barely acknowledged. The higher-IQ end of the boomer generation enthusiastically traded traditional metaphysics for nihilistic existentialism, atheism, subjectivism, secular humanism, and postmodernist relativism, and attitudes stemming from all those things combined eventually filtered down to the more average and lower intellects among them and the next couple generations to follow.

2. There will likely be a (re)segregation of the sexes in many religious and spiritual spaces. Yeah, the sexual revolution and that great cultural catastrophe known as feminism has failed, bigtime. The ham-fisted forced infiltration of women into male spaces has spectacularly failed as well. We’ve had to re-learn the hard way that men and women are indeed different, and that members of each respective sex learn, communicate, and conduct their affairs in different ways. Mindlessly and carelessly blending the two sexes in organized activities just creates chaos and anarcho-tyranny. The wish to dissolve boundaries, differences, and distinctions was one of the major themes of boomer spirituality, probably owing to a rather shallow reading of various Eastern mystical teachings. We can see exactly where that mentality has gotten us. Within religious organization, putting women in magisterial roles has proven to be an unmitigated disaster. There’s a damn good reason why most Mainline Protestant churches today care about little more than flying rainbow flags, screeching woke bromides from the rafters, and going on and on about how terrible and evil the Orange Emperor is. The average age in those congregations likely hovers around 75. Meanwhile, younger people interested in something resembling spiritual discipline are joining Traditionalist Catholic and Orthodox Churches; y’know, the sorts of places where the Priest is still allowed to tell you what a woman is.

3. Spirituality may once again become something much grater than a vehicle for individual navel-gazing and narcissistic self-expression. Perhaps a great emphasis on collective purpose will come to replace so much of the self-indulgent nonsense that defined boomer spirituality; as we know, 1001 boats each going their separate way does not a community make; the catastrophic failure of most boomer utopian communes from the 60s and 70s clearly illustrates this. Instead of chasing unrealistic ideals, perhaps the emerging spiritualties will focus on more imminent, attainable goals.

4. The emphasis on tangible action over mere virtue-signaling and platitude-bombing (usually in service of naked self-interest). Hopefully, we’ll once again learn to walk the walk, not just talk the talk. Perhaps a greater emphasis on serious introspection will become a thing. Of course moral hypocrisy will always be with us, as those hypocritical, moralizing-yet-sinmaxxing pastors and spiritual gurus aren’t going away any time soon.

5. Right now we’re seeing the beginnings of a renewed sense of respect and reverence for time-honored traditions and the great sacrifices our ancestors bequeathed to us. This will only increase more over time as more and more boomers leave this world and pass into the afterlife. One of the hallmarks of the postmodern Neopagan project was the wholesale rejection of the entire Judeo-Christian part of our Western civilizational heritage; in practice this results in antinomianism and the “rebel without a clue” mentality, because such a significant part of our history occurred under the auspices of Christian moral and social order. This re-embrace of our heritage doesn’t necessarily mean everyone going back to dogmatic Christianity. Rather, we can say that emerging and evolving pluralistic spiritualties will at least acknowledge the good things Christian traditions have given us. Some groups may even come to re imagine the Bible as a collection of sibylline oracles to draw varying degree of spiritual inspiration from, rather than an infallible, literally-interpreted text that is the final authority on every topic imaginable.

6. We may finally see a move away from the shrill and rigid moral universalism that’s been a norm for a very long time. Boomers probably thought their spiritualities were moving away from this, but instead just replaced existing forms of shrill moral universalism with their own brand of shrill moral universalism. Some of us have realized that it’s all cringe, not just one or another particular flavor of it. It seems the Aquarian energies are ever-increasing in our collective consciousness and as a result, the various forms of monolatry and simplistic spiritual formulae will likely become less of a common feature. The boomers arrogantly proclaimed, “all you need is love!” Yeah, umm, not really. In actuality, the world can be a very hostile place full of unfriendly people and groups who will jump at any chance to come grab your stuff (and possibly kill you in the process) when they think they can get away with it. Kudos to Heathenry for re-introducing the concepts of boundaries and self-protective measures having a sacral quality to them; hopefully this carries over into at least some of the emerging spiritualties.

7. By that, will there be a return of in-group cultural particularism? The liberal half of the boomer generation is real big on xenophilia (their seeming-love of foreign cultures) and a resulting shunning and hatred of their own Western cultural heritage. Of course, this attitude didn’t actually start with the boomers, but first became a thing in late 19th century occult and spiritual circles, when the embrace of newly-discovered (to Westerners) Eastern spiritual traditions (Orientalism) became all the rage. By that time, centuries of Western rationalism, scientific discoveries, and the resulting critical examination of Christian doctrines and the Biblicist worldview, rendered a dogmatic and literalist interpretation of the religion’s teachings a nonstarter for most educated and intelligent people. Said xenophila was a reaction to “the death of God” and boomers cranked that reaction to 11. Boomers are often criticized for appropriating Eastern spiritual practices without understanding their cultural or historical contexts. For example, yoga and meditation are sometimes reduced to trendy lifestyle choices, stripped of their deeper philosophical roots. The sort of Westernized (i.e. secularized) Buddhism that some boomers embraced and promoted, became more about therapy and self-help than about spiritual liberation from trappings of the material world. In fact, many boomer “Buddhists” are in fact atheists who don’t believe in any higher spiritual reality. Similar to many New Age spiritual groups, the boomer leaders of Westernized Buddhist groups run them like money-hungry business enterprises (The money part is of course an American phenomenon, and not necessarily a boomer-specific one). I think the realization that we, as Westerners, have very rich traditions of our own to draw from, will begin to skin in more and more. The impending “Second Religiosity” of Spenglerian historical theory, will likely come to fully embrace this notion.

8. I’m probably failing to think of a lot of other good points that should be on this list, but I think I did an OK job summing up the major themes and how those themes might become undone in the near-to-distant future.
causticus: trees (Default)
It goes without saying that intelligence is very prized and valued in our culture. What I mean by intelligence is a grab bag of “big brain” traits like mental sharpness, cleverness, mathematical proclivity, and good verbal skills. In so many of our culture’s high-paying, high-status occupations, intelligence is key. Intelligence is very useful; especially when it comes to manipulating the physical environment and coming up with ever-more efficient ways of extracting goodies from it. Having an advanced degree from a prestigious academic institution is supposedly a good proxy (err...a very expensive one!!) for being gifted in the area of measurable intelligence, or so the story goes.

Wisdom is much harder to measure, if it can even be measured at all. It’s why grading papers (beyond the technical aspects of writing) is mostly a subjective art, as opposed to the completely-objective process of scoring a math test. If Intelligence corresponds with the so-called “left brain,” then Wisdom is the domain of the “right brain.” Wisdom contains the intangible and unquantifiable aspects of what actually make us “smart.” Wisdom is creative, artistic, and intuitive, whereas Intelligence is technical, nimble, and quantifiable. If Intelligence is STEM, then Wisdom is the Humanities side of academia.

Those familiar with Dungeons & Dragons, and similar Fantasy Role Playing Games (RPGs), will immediately recognize these two terms as being attributes found on the player’s character sheet. Intelligence is what makes a powerful Wizard, and Wisdom is what makes a good Cleric. Of course, the human physical and psycho-spiritual makeup is magnitudes more complex than a simple list of eight attribute scores. But to make a quick point, a small dose of nerdy category-reductionism can be sometimes helpful. In D&D, Wisdom is a shorthand way of saying “psycho-spiritual acumen.” It’s much better marketing to use a commonly-understood word than to explain the game mechanics using clinical-sounding psychobabble. But I do digress.

Incarnation as a levelling-up process

Our finest spiritual teachings might suggest that both Wisdom and Intelligence are things that increase in the individual soul as it accumulates more and more human incarnations under its belt. One very key thing to take into account is that Intelligence all by itself has nothing to do with a person’s morality; intelligence is a gift that can be used for good, evil, and neutral purposes. A soul that develops intelligence at a fast past over a limited number of human incarnations may experience several lifetimes where they misuse their intelligence in service of various self-serving and short-sighted goals; this would be the “clever fool.” To understand the sometimes-amoral nature of intelligence, it’s interesting to recall that Mercury is the god of thieves and fraudsters. Mercury is the celestial intelligence that rules over flexibility and nimbleness of all kinds, including mental nimbleness. Mercury is raw intelligence. Mercury is the god of Tricknology. (Sorry D&D purists, but Intelligence is really just Cognitive Dexterity)

There is a connection though between Wisdom and moral agency; a wise person may “know” what’s right in a situation, even if they fail to act on that realization. In isolation, Wisdom is a passive state consisting of a cross-contextualization of accumulated experiences and abstract impressions. Without right action, Wisdom is wasted potential. A soul with a lot of Wisdom (been there, done that, many times over) will cultivate a native sense of right and wrong; such a person will have much less dependence on whatever set of concrete rules and moral commandments their culture imposes on them. As a result, a “wise” person can become quite resentful if they happen to live in a society that’s way too conformist and restrictive. In excess, this resentment can result in a state of perma-rebelliousness and a tendency toward reactive anitnomianism. Another downside of Wisdom is the tendency to get lost in lofty abstractions and lose touch with the banal reality on the ground. Adults without families (or businesses) to take care of are especially prone to this sort of psychological waywardness. No, “fur babies” don’t count. Au contraire, our spiritual “lessers” still know how to touch grass.

Ugh, more categories

In the Myers-Briggs personality typology (a commercial bastardization of Carl Jung’s psychological type theory), the trait “Intuition” is a fairly close proxy for the sort of Wisdom I’m getting at here. The so-called “Intuition type” has become an identity for adoring fans of this system to latch onto as a crude means of differentiating themselves from the hordes of those pitiful, simple souls with less Wisdom (i.e. “Sensing” types) than thou, or so the story goes. “INTJ” and “INTP” types are those who fancy themselves as being gifted in the areas of both Intelligence and Wisdom. “NF” types like INFJ are more specialized in the area of Wisdom, though typically with an artistic, creative, or romantic bent (maybe this is where that other attribute, Charisma, starts to creep in).

There are of course other systems of accounting for the varying levels of soul maturity found throughout humanity. The Gnostics of late antiquity uses a tripartite scheme. They categorized all people into three categories, from least to most wise, (1) Hylics, (2) Psychics, and (3) Pneumatics. Hylics have very little Wisdom. They are are those young, immature souls who are the most drawn toward the ordinary sensory experiences the material world has to offer; they are sensual, possess rudimentary intellect, and are mostly driven by their base appetites. Pneumatics have Wisdom out the wazoo are seen as being spiritually gifted; these are the rare souls known to us as sages, mystics, philosophers, and saints; that is, when they do decide to come out of their hidey-holes and show themselves to the unwashed masses. Psychics are the broad mass of humanity that makes up the middle ground between these two extremes. Really, there are many different levels and gradations that might fall within this expansive umbrella. Most people reading this post are likely going to be in the mid-to-upper tiers of the Psychic category.

The Gnostics borrowed this scheme from Plato’s conception of the soul having thee parts (and infused it with their obsession with spirit/matter dualism): Nous (Higher Mind), Thumos (Spiritedness, Passion), and Epithumia (Appetite, Survival Instincts). This is somewhat similar to the three “gunas” of Hindu Yoga philosophy: Sattva, Rajas, and Tamas. In Taoist internal alchemy theory there are: Shen, Qi, and Jing. So on, so forth, you get the picture.

Diversity is our strength

These overlapping theories might lead one into the uncomfortable territory of entertaining the notion that “humanity” is in fact an intractable hodgepodge of differing levels of soul-development and maturity; some individual souls are closer to the animal realm they recently emerged out of, whereas others are closer to graduating out of humanity and eventually becoming something akin to a demigod or angelic being.

The next logical step within this theory is the idea that these differing qualities manifest quite differently in different cultures and ethnic groups, when we speak of group-average traits and behaviors. After 2000 years of mono-ideologies ruling the roost, the notion of Difference has become somewhat of a scare-concept; after all, the American constitution says we were all created “equal” or something. Today, the discussion of innate difference is quite taboo in some circles. Among the educated literati of the West, the tendency of outright bunk theorizing is either to deny human group difference outright (Blank-slate Egalitarianism) or to embrace it in a gross, vulgar, materialist-reductionist manner (Race Realism); when the lowly plebes latch onto the latter theory, it tends to get even more gross and vulgar. I think the taboo fixation associated with the former comes from the sort of cognitive dissonance that is a product of the West’s obsession with Practical Intelligence; we love it and we hold the entirety of humanity to a weird standard that’s defined by almost solely by ideals associated with Intelligence-related aptitudes. When the facts on the ground report back to us that an imbalanced development of Intelligence isn’t the global norm, nor is it the be-all, end-all of human existence, Western brains start to go haywire and respond erratically (what’s known as “Reeeeeeeeeee!” in today’s memeology). Few “smart” people these days can talk about this sensitive topic without an emotional meltdown quickly ensuing.

Closing thoughts

I think this is one of those areas where Intelligence and Wisdom should certainly be harmonized. But, no, a balanced approach to discoursing on hot topics is apparently something the ancients were able to do, not us (I’m being a bit facetious here; surely, the ancients of various locales each had their own assortment of no-no topics).

Whatever one’s perspective may be on this subject matter, it’s quite apparent that there is no shortage of sup-topics to explore on the wonderfully-varied landscape of human psycho-spiritual qualities. With Intelligence and Wisdom gracefully-applied in tandem, such exploration will be something more nuanced and interesting than an IQ score, a D&D character sheet, a crude racial stereotype, or a silly Myers-Briggs personality type profile.
causticus: trees (Default)
What follows is a very brief summary of the religious, spiritual, and occult practices of the ancient Etruscan culture of Iron Age Italy. It’s what we know or can deduce via historical records, archaeology, and semi-contemporary second and third-hand sources. Much of this information I gleaned from a book on “Pagan Europe” by Nigel Pennick, an English historian, occultist, and pagan.



1. Spiritual Science: The Etruscans seems to have made no hard distinction between priestcraft, spirituality, science, and occultism. They apparently saw all of these areas of study as being of a divine/numinous nature. A spiritual view was incorporated into every facet of life. “Secularism” as we know it today would have been totally alien to the Etruscans.

2. Professional Priests: Unlike the Greeks and the Romans, the Etruscans had a full-time, professional priesthood. A Priest was known as a Maru, whether he was a Cultic Priest, Augur, or Sacral Magistrate (deputy to the Lucumo). Religious specialists underwent periods of intensive training at specialized colleges.

3. Sacral Kingship: The Etruscans as a whole people had no centralized state. Rather, they formed a league of different city-states and surrounding territories, usually numbering about 12. Each city-state was headed by a high priest known as the Lucumo, who (along with his deputies) was responsible for carrying out the public ceremonies of the Etruscan religion. The Lucumo was regarded as a king, but perhaps just in a ceremonial sense during the later phases of Etruscan civilization. The style of his diadem, his scepter, his purple robe, his staff of office, and his ivory throne were adopted by the Roman magistrates, later by the emperors, and eventually by the Roman Catholic Pope and cardinals. The sacred offices of the lucumones were carried out after the overthrow of the Etruscan kings in Rome by a ceremonial “king,” the Rex Sacrorum. What’s fascinating here is that we see a very ancient priestly practice that carried on in an unbroken manner from deep prehistorical times, up until the modern age in the West. Perhaps the Tarot trump, “The Hierophant” best encapsulates the essence of this venerable Western tradition.


Reject lawyer-priest modernity; retvrn to priest-king tradition

4. Master Diviners: Each Lucumo was advised by a body of priestly scholars, known as haruspices. Today we mainly remember them for their skill in divination, but they were also known for being astronomers, mathematicians, and engineers. Even after Rome destroyed Etruscan political power, a college of haruspices was maintained in the city of Rome as a part of its administrative establishment. Bird augury, the examination of animal livers, and the interpretation of various other omens were the primary types of Etruscan divination practices. Multiple Roman authors and historians have pointed out that Rome’s divination practices were derived from the Etruscans. These Roman commentators also noted how divination was everything to the Etruscans; practically everything they did in ordinary life was accompanied by divination of one sort or another. The Romans were more secular-minded and generally regarded the Etruscans as being very superstitious. Having said that, I think from this we can conclude that the Etruscans were masters of divination like no other people in the region of that time.

5. Revealed Texts: Though thoroughly-polytheistic, like just about all other peoples of that time period, the Etruscans derived much of their religious instruction from a corpus of revealed texts. The books were manuals on divination, interpretation of omens, the allotment of time, the afterlife, and instructions on the proper performance of cultic rituals. One of the twelve cities, Tarquinii, became the holy city of the entire league. It was in that city where priests from all over the Etruscan realm went for training. Perhaps the “Sibylline Oracles” of Roman tradition are derived from this.

6. Magical City Layout: Nigel Pennick speculates that the way the Etruscans plotted out their cities and countryside districts seemed to have been magical in nature. Town plans were optimized for magical protection of settlements, and perhaps there was an astrological component to this sacred science. They used a foursquare plan, oriented to the cardinal points of the compass. From a central point or plaza, four roads ran out, each intersecting with the city wall to form four gates. Though often, the Northern quarter was omitted and thus it was a system of three roads and three gates instead. This plan seems to date to the Bronze Age, and is likely derived from the town layouts of the Terramare Culture of Northern Italy. The Romans acknowledged that their concern with land and law was derived from the Etruscans. Roman military camps were based on this Disciplina Etrusca, and some Roman towns and cities were built around the foursquare plan; a famous example being the Roman-British city of Colchester, founded by the Etruscophile emperor Claudius in 49 CE. I can only speculate that the magic of Etruscan town planning had a lot to do with the art and science of how to keep miasma and noxious entities out of their settlements. The Romans considered the home itself to be a sacred enclosure that should be safe from the chaotic energies of the outside world and the wilds beyond.

7. Fatalism: The Etruscans seemed to believe that everything that occurred was the will of the gods, in one way or another. They even plotted out precisely how long their own civilization would last, and these predictions ended up being not too far off the mark. Perhaps this is why the Etruscans went out without so much as a whimper, once it became readily apparent that Rome would gobble up all of Italy in due time. Though whether this fatalism also applied to personal spirituality is anyone’s best guess. In fact, we know very little about the inner spirituality of the Etruscans, as these things were either never written down, or if they were, any records of their beliefs on these topics would have been lost beneath the shifting sands of history.

8. Etruscan Religion: I won’t go into much detail here on the Etruscan pantheon, as that would go well beyond the scope of this brief summary. But if so inclined, read about it here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Etruscan_mythological_figures

Having said that, one thing I find quite interesting is that the Etruscans worshiped multiple pantheons side-by-side. They had one for their own archaic indigenous gods, then a group of celestial deities that seem to be of Indo-European origin, and then at some point they adopted a some of the Greek gods and heroes the during their orientalizing phase. Some of the indigenous gods made it into the Roman pantheon; for example, Selvans as Silvanus. Finally there was a fourth category of deities, the dii involuti ("veiled" or "hidden gods") which were a group of gods, or possibly a principle, superior to the ordinary pantheon of gods. In contrast to the ordinary Etruscan gods, these hidden gods were not the object of direct worship and were never depicted. Another very interesting thing is that there was some dispute among Romans on whom the chief Etruscan deity was. One view was that the (very Indo-European) sky god Tinia, (also god of boundaries and the law, much like the Greek Zeus) was the head god. Varro took a different view and considered Voltumna (aka Veltune) to be the chief god. It seems Veltune was some sort of cthonic counterpart to Tinia. The early Roman religion seems to have shared a similar dynamic, with Vediovis being an underworld version of Jupiter. I’m reminded too of Slavic paganism having a similar dynamic with Perun (sky) and Veles (underworld). Overall, it seems the Romans inherited the Etruscans eclectic tendencies regarding deities and mythology.

9. The Dead: From archaeology, perhaps the most notable thing about the Etruscan religion was their reverence for the dead. The earliest Etruscan remains are elaborate stone tombs dating from about 750 BCE. As the culture devolved they built vast Necropoli, which have been uncovered in modern times near the sites of what were the most significant Etruscan cities. Almost everything we know today about Etruscan art comes from these tombs. Just look up images of Etruscan art on your favorite search engine and you’ll see exactly what I’m referring to. Note however that the artistic style and technique tends to be very derivative of Greek (and to a lesser extent, Phoenician) styles.

10. What Remains? The aforementioned Etruscan-loving Roman emperor Claudius reportedly wrote a massive 12-book history of the Etruscans. Unfortunately, that work was lost in its entirety after the Western Roman Empire collapsed and hordes of Christian fanatics and barbarian invaders reduced must of classical antiquity’s high culture to dust. What I listed above are merely fragmentary hints as what must have been the immense splendor of Etruscan religious, spiritual, and magical traditions. It seems the Romans inherited many of their religious and divinatory practices from the Etruscans, but even this must have come to them in a piecemeal and fragmentary form. The Romans certainly did a lot of history-rewriting and memory-holing after they became the undisputed king of the Italian hill. Some things we’ll just never know. My very rough and speculative take is that magical knowledge as a whole has been on the steady decline since the Bronze Age, and the Etruscans were one example of a culture that did a fantastic job at holding onto as much of the old knowledge as they were capable of doing.
causticus: trees (Default)
This is my view, which is based off an informal western occult view. According to this line of thinking, there are whole kingdoms of lifeforms that lack the hard, physical bodies that humans and other biological creatures have.


Who ever said fairy glamour had to be glamorous?

These ones in particular that some people in the current era experience as UFOs and "aliens," are what peoples the world over have always understood to be nature spirits. They exist on the etheric plane, which is the plane of vital energy that is layered over and interpenetrates our own; really it's the vital energetic scaffolding that vivifies matter that would otherwise be dead/inert.

Since human consciousness is focused on the material plane, most of us can't normally see these ethereal life forms unless they deliberately manifest as an intelligible form for a short duration. These manifestations are devised via a psychic connection and come in forms that make sense to the popular human consciousness of the time. So if the mass-mythos currently has a sci-fi flavor, the manifested forms will be according to that particular theme. In previous eras (and still today!) we hear of gnomes, elves, dwarves, and other spirits appearing as mini humanoids clad in medieval European peasant garb. The "true form" of nature spirits is something akin to energy orbs, which are invisible to all but those who have the clairvoyant abilities required to see them. These creatures perform essential functions in nature like distributing vital energies to specific plants and minerals; they're essentially a type of worker drones in the subtle side of ecosystem maintenance and development and answer to the commands of a presiding local deva, what the Romans called a Genius Loci (Guardian Spirit of Place).

Some races of nature spirits have a playful side to them and sometimes they mess with humans for their own amusement, or some other reason we can't even fathom.

I think this accounts for some reported UFO encounters. The rest I would say fall under the category of government psyops. And no, UFOs aren't literally biological humanoid aliens flying in space ships from another planet or solar system. People today always demand material explanations for everything, thus "space aliens" is the go-to narrative for UFO sightings and encounters.


**Sources used**
-Monsters (John Michael Greer)
-The Kingdom of the Gods (Geoffrey Hodson)
-The Astral Plane - It's Scenery, Inhabitants, and Phenomenon (CW Leadbetter)
causticus: trees (Default)
I guess this is somewhat of an addendum to my previous post on Neopagan groups serving as fronts for various political activist causes.

On yesterday's Magic Monday post, [personal profile] jprussell posted a follow-up question on a comment thread; there he asked JMG, "Can egregores ever act as vehicles for actual divine powers?"

JMG responded affirmatively, "Yes, and in fact that's how religion works -- the egregor of a deity becomes a vehicle for the divine power. What sets a real religion apart from the kind of thing we're discussing is that real religions are born out of religious experience: people have personal encounters with a divine power, their experiences become the template for an egregor, and the egregor becomes a meeting ground through which the divine and the human interact. In a fake religion, the egregor is created by human beings for human purposes, and the divine never comes into the picture at all."

Then [personal profile] tamanous2020 added, "Interesting! That explains why movements who utilize religion as the vehicle of a political cause (whether it's neo-conservative/woke christianity or say white nationalist who take to Norse drag) end up having such a poor record of producing either mystics or even spiritually changed laypeople. They're not even trying to dial up the right god(s)."

JMG responded, "Ding! We have a winner. Exactly; if all you've got at the top of your system is a human-made egregor, that's as far as you can go."

I think this is a very important point that can add some extra depth to what I have been investigating. Namely, that in trying to discern a spiritual/religious endeavor from mere pageantry or political activism, it might be helpful to look at the overall character of a given group's participants. A good litmus test might be, "is this group a place where any of its members have experienced at least some degree of spiritual change for the better?"
causticus: trees (Default)
I very seldom remember my dreams. And if I do, it's usually only fragments of them. I very rarely feel like I have much of any control over my dreams and the ones I can remember seem rather random to the point where I don't bother trying to decipher whatever symbolism might be contained within. Recently though I've had flashbacks of dreams that seem to occur on repeat, yet I never really remember them. The one thing I do remember is "flying" in them. The precise motion would be me pushing downward on the air with my hands and a levitation effect results from those movements. Really, the motions are very similar to what I would do if I was swimming underwater and wanted to ascend to the surface. But anyway, this "flying" conjures up a thought of deep familiarity, though I can really make sense of it beyond that.

Last night though I had what I'm very sure was a lucid dream. I was suddenly in my old house and it was vivid and extremely detailed. And right I was I was fully cognizant of the fact I was in a dream. As I was walking down the stairs I was touching and feeling the wooden hand-railing and the spindles. It felt so real! I could feel the pressure and fiction of grasping material objects. This place felt as real as any other place, despite my full awareness I was in a dream. Now, this lucid dream was not one that I willed myself into (I'm not sure I even know how to do that); rather, I just happened to end up there, for whatever reason. As I got to the bottom of the stairs, I suddenly remembered my old levitation maneuver. "Hmm, let me try this out," I thought to myself. Then I was slowly floating my way back up the stairs. When I got to the top the scenery changed and there was a wall in front of me that was definitely not part of my old house. Then the lucid dream suddenly ended and I was no longer there.

Was this a brief lesson of sorts? I have no idea. But I did come out of this with an immediate intuitive grasp of how the astral plane is just as real the material. Now, this doesn't mean I'm going to make an effort to go astral travelling; such an endeavor seems entirely foolish unless there is a very specific, spiritually-affirming reason to do so. I also realize it's a big wilderness of unknowns and the sort of dangers and pitfalls that comes along with that sort of territory. But overall I think this topic might be something very safe to explore in meditation.
causticus: trees (Default)
I think I just had my first super-obvious TSW magical experience last night. And lo and behold, it was from Natural Magic; the most basic of it, to be honest.

But first. I have to point out that I'm quite blessed to have an amazing park right around the corner from where I live. There's a whole system of hiking trails there and many of them pass through secluded forested areas. I've developed a fondness for a cluster of majestic Northern Red Oaks that grow in one particular corner of the park.

Anyway, I discovered a plentiful supply of Mugwort (Artemisia Vulgaris) growing alongside a couple of of the trails. I have actually been looking for Mugwort for quite some time, but my plant-identification skills are still in the amateur phase. I've found plant identification apps on my phone to be quite the useful tool for speeding along my learning process in this area. By that, I was curious what this very tall and conspicuous "weed" growing in large clusters actually was. The app pegged Mugwort being the highest likely match for this plant. I then said to myself, "duh!" Knowing this plant has magical properties, particularly associated with protection and vivid dreams, I harvested some and brought it home.



Before I went to bed I placed a couple of leaf-bunches on my night table, right next to where I sleep. And within minutes I started feeling that intense "vivid dream" haze taking over my consciousness, even before I actually fell asleep. Instant results.

Now, I've had experiences doing other types of magic, but my experiences with that tends to be on the mild side of things and never beyond the threshold of plausible deniability (in terms of those experiences being anything other than just weird sensations).

The obvious takeaway here seems that Natural Magic is probably the most accessible "gateway drug" to the realm of demonstrable magical experience out there. It's just unfortunate that unflattering labels like "witchcraft" have become attached to this age-old body of practices.

Having said all of that, I'm open to other possible uses for this magical herb!
causticus: trees (Default)
Not long after I first delved into the magical side of John Michael Greer’s (JMG) work, I began contemplating the idea of getting involved with organized Revival Druidry. Eventually, after about a year of somewhat-steady SOP practice and casual occult study, I joined the Ancient Order of Druids of America (AODA). However, to this day, I have yet to become active there, in terms of starting their curriculum, or getting involved in their online forum and chat group. I joined, thinking they were the last "sane" organization of this type still around. And by sane, I mean not totally overtaken by the woke mind virus that has consumed nearly every alt-spirituality organization. I figured that AODA came to be in its current form largely thanks to the great efforts of JMG in saving the order from near-death and rebuilding it into a robust and active organization. Granted, he rebuilt the order long before the general culture shifted its collective focus to politics away from non-political things. Before this shift (c. 2013), most organized human activities here in the US, be it hobbies, pop-culture fandoms, religious groups, sports clubs, ect. were primarily focused on whatever the actual purpose of their group was. The intrusion of outside politics tended to be minimal. Well, not so today!!

Vibes Do Tell

When I first signed up for AODA, I read over its literature quite meticulously so as to get an overall feel of the organization’s “vibe.” I tend to be very cagey and cautious when it comes to getting involved with any new group. Being already quite familiar with Revival Druidry, what I read in the literature wasn’t all that surprising. But a few things rubbed me the wrong way. I could tell that the overall group culture leaned pretty far to the left. The typical “progressive” and “PC” values were right there, front and center, though not in any kind of aggressive or obnoxious form. There was no obvious “Cultural Marxism” (i.e. “oppressor vs. oppressed” demographic conflict rhetoric) that has become the mainstay of most of the Neopagan scene in recent years. But I saw the seeds of this eventual intrusion lying in wait. It was clear much of the membership base came from the typical middle-class “PMC” university-educated background. People in this cultural bubble are usually dialed into the ubiquitous Neoliberal mass media echo chamber, and thus their political and cultural beliefs on any given day tend to be whatever the mainstream media feeds them; even if last month’s “news” totally contradicts this week’s “news.” Granted, conservatives are dialed into their own media echo chamber, and their own “news” parroting behavior is very little different from that of the left’s. But I don’t have space or patience to further explore the topic of media critique, so I’ll leave that off right here.

Woke Progressivism Consumes All

So even that vibe didn’t deter me from considering to start the curriculum at some point. But life got in the way and various duties and distractions became a barrier to me being able to devote my undivided attention to what would be a very involved grade-advancement process. So that non-active state persisted for many months as I kept weighing the pro’s and con’s of getting involved. And then one day, on one of these Ecosophia-adjacent DW blogs, I read an interesting comment that suggested something I had suspected would eventually happen to AODA. To paraphrase the comment, “AODA is currently imploding from wokeness.” Of course, I must acknowledge that this was an anonymous comment, and taken at face value, is merely a rumor coming from one person who claims to be a member of the group. Since I’m not involved in the group’s discussion spaces, I have no real way of conforming or denying the rumor. But, if there is any truth to the rumor, I have to say I’m not surprised at all. Circling back to the group’s literature, I remember quite clearly being a bit off-put by overall writing style of the contributing authors: the sheer amount of wishy-washy relativism, permissiveness (the seeming urge to be 'inclusive' of everything under the sun that doesn’t oppose progressivism), and general female-orientation to the whole affair. These attributes are quite typical of new age, neopagan, and alt-spirituality groups in this era; all which are cultural offshoots of the 1960’s counterculture. Basically, the Druid Revival in its current form, despite its “Mesopagan” roots, is firmly adjacent to the Neopagan scene; one that happens to be in a state of full-blown collapse right now. Thus I’ve concluded that it's a not good idea to get involved with any of these groups right now, as they've all been infected by the aforementioned woke virus, which itself seems to be merely a symptom of the collapse of the Neoliberal Order, and the Professional-Managerial Class (PMC) which serves as the overseer class of this regime. Because of these monumental cultural forces at play, I’m loathe to blame the leadership of these DR organizations for what’s currently happening. The current Grand Archdruid of AODA seems like a very nice and wise person. But she can’t control the kind of media and other pop-culture influences the broader membership consumes on a daily basis. She can’t control which friends, family, and work colleagues each member fraternizes with. After all, one of the central ethical planks of Revival Druidry is to not employ the methods of mind-control cults!! At the end of the day, people are going to do what they are going to do, and in reality this usually means going along with whatever herdthink prevails among one’s own subculture or social class.

So, HYPOTHETICALLY, if say 65% of AODA's membership goes woke and starts demanding the leadership make woke ideology the organization’s main stated purpose for existing, there’s nothing the leadership can do except, (a) capitulate to the mob’s demands and make the organization officially woke, which is what happened to ADF, (b) resign and walk away, leaving the organization in the hands of a new woke leadership, or (c) immediately purge all the wokesters and brace for impact; (d) quietly disband the organization and wait for all the culture war insanity to die down before re-forming the group. Unless the leadership has an iron cohones, super thick skin (not afraid of hurting people’s feelings), and knack for decisiveness, (c) ain’t going to happen, and probably not (d) either. Option (c) seems rather un-Druidly anyway, since the leader would have to become a Grand Inquisitor and devote their time and energy to engaging in counter-witchhunts. A weak or negligent leader will often go with (a), naively thinking they can appease the mob and comply their way out of mass hysteria. It’s perhaps (b) which would be the most foolish choice of all, as it will result in wokesters taking over and essentially destroying the organization and its brand/symbolism, and possibly contaminating the group’s egregore to the point of no return. Overall, it seems like anything but (d) is the makings of a lose-lose situation.

Without Groves, What's the Point?

On a more personal note, even if AODA wasn't compromised (which may be the case still, as I'm going on just a rumor), I still think that participating probably wouldn't give me much more than I'd get from self-study and self-initiation. The organization itself is rather small and as a result there's very few local groves that actually exist. One of the big advantages I'd see from joining a Druid Order would be the opportunity to be part of a local grove. But, fearing the aforementioned rumor is likely true to some extent, getting involved with a local grove probably wouldn't be all the helpful or desirable for me given the sort of left-progressive culture that permeates these groups. No, I most certainly don't want to be a part of any human activity where I have to constantly walk on eggshells around the other participants, out of fear of saying something "offensive" to whatever The Current Thing deems offensive this week. And if I'm really looking for peer support in this work, I honestly think at this point the Ecosophia/MM commentariat is more than sufficient.

Going Along to Get Along vs. Going Against the Grain

To reiterate something I was getting at above, I think even the best and well-meaning organizations within the Neopagan/Alt-Spirituality fold are essentially defenseless against the woke onslaught. It's not so much these groups get "infiltrated" by wokesters; rather it's the membership base that has been in these groups all along is constantly downloading mental "software updates" via their preferred media echo chamber, and what typically happens is that next week the The Current Thing updates to some new cause-du-jour, and the rank and file start making demands on the leadership to "take a stand" against whatever The Current Thing is raging at the moment. If the leadership is evasive or does nothing, an even bigger stink is made until they capitulate; if still nothing is done, some kind of split or schism with the group happens and the "old faction" which refuses to get with the times is quickly denounced as being complicit or sympathetic with whatever the mob happens to be shrieking about, thus the “brace for impact” quip above. I think in most cases, otherwise-well-meaning leadership is weak or simply afraid of negative publicity or people being offended, thus they fold. And thus another one bites the dust.

Sadly, I believe the Druid Revival (as a group activity) will not survive the cultural collapse we’re going through right now. If it’s to re-form some time in the future after the dust finally settles, it must rise from the ashes in a new form; a form that is as distant as possible from anything reeking of Neopagan, New Age, Boomerism, or Neoliberal “Progressive” aesthetics and values.
causticus: trees (Default)
When it comes to the naming and branding of any new group, project, or endeavor, I subscribe to the concept of "Occult Memetics." This concept is basically a recognition of the magical power of language. The term itself is something the Youtuber Tarl Warwick (Styxhexenhammer666) came up with, and he even published a book by that name further explaining the concept.

On how I'm working with that concept right now, it has much to do with the recent turn I've taken in terms of my own polytheistic religious orientation (which I'll explain in another post). I had a recent conversation with a few friends of a similar orientation on how words like "paganism" and "heathen" are loaded with so much historical-ideological baggage that they tend to elicit certain emotional responses in ordinary people who hear these words uttered and it immediately taints the way the rest of the conversation proceeds. Because of that, in my view, organizations/groups that proudly brandish those labels tend to attract more than their fair share of misfits and malcontents; certainly more of these types than sensible people of moderate temperament who are looking for a spiritual option that isn't a dogmatic organized religion that's bogged down with a 1500 year old ideology.

Some alternative brands a few of us have been proposing are as follows:

-Natural Faith
-The Natural Way
-The Ancestral Way
-The Way of Spirit
-Ancestral Faith
-Natural Faith: Northern Tradition (Germanic/Heathen)
-Natural Faith: Southern (or Classical) Tradition (Greco-Roman)

All of these fit well within the fold of the broader effort to revive and revitalize polytheism and animism as religions people can take on and incorporate into their everyday lives. And by refraining from using "polytheism" as the main label, "Natural Faith" allows for the inclusion of various metaphysical positions like Pantheism, Panentheism, ect.

Ultimately, if these "Natural Faiths" of ours are to (re)grow and stick around for the long haul, they must appeal to enough "normies," that is, people who are not excessively eccentric and misfit types; in other words, people who are busy with the things we associate with ordinary life like raising families, working at a trade or other discipline, running businesses, ect. In times past, these traditions survived and thrived in family lineages. This is how the real "paganism" of yore existed.

The way it stands today is that "Paganism" (especially Neopaganism) is little more than a lifestyle diversion for city-dwelling ex-Christians who feel a great sense of alienation from their faith-of-upbringing. The astral and egregoric content associated with words like "Pagan" and "Heathen" are quite off-putting for anyone who hasn't delved into that particular "fandom" subculture.

In a follow-up post I'll go into more detail about the gradual disappearance of the tribe and clan in any official capacity, and the various ways these associations have cropped up again (and disappeared) over time. And of course, I'll go into how these associations are a must if any of us are to revive and revitalize the Ancestral Way.
causticus: trees (Default)
The Astrological Ages, aka the Precession of the Equinoxes

Age of Taurus (Earth element, governed by Venus) approx. 4000 - 2420 BCE -- Religion across the world mostly consists of hyperlocal fertility cults and elaborate funerary customs, with a ton of bull and snake symbolism. Practices are very nature/earth oriented. Compared to the two Ages to follow, some degree of gender equality is the norm, though most of the major cultures are at least some patriarchal, due to the tendencies of monarchy and the increases in fixed property ownership as societies become more agrarian and sedentary. The cultures which grow and develop technological complexity end up funneling much of their collective resources into earthworks, engineering projects, and monumental buildings. In these cultures the institutions of sacralized monarchy, legalism, and organized priesthoods become established and more complex and ossified as time moves on.

Age of Aries (Fire element, governed by Mars) approx. 2420 - 260 BCE -- War, conquest, militarism, fire sacrifices, and a martial heroic ethos, and masculinity in general. are the hallmarks of this age. Thundering sky and war gods play a leading role in the cultures which rose to prominence in this age; these “leading edge” cultures are extremely patriarchal and socially-stratified, sometimes marked by fixed caste systems. Aries commences with the warlike Semitic Akkadians conquering the Sumerian civilization. At the same time, the Indo-European steppe tribes spread all over Eurasia and conquer and assimilate many different local farming cultures. The symbolism of the bull being sacrificed is marks the transition from Taurus to Aries, and this lives on in many traditions including Judaism (Exodus) and Mithraism (its key motif). The mythos of the classical Greek culture is thoroughly infused with Aries symbolism and this is most exemplified by Homer's epics, the Iliad and Odyssey. (The Hebrew Bible as well) The older cultures on the fringes of civilization still retain quite a bit of their Tauran elements far into this age however, only to eventually find Arian cultures banging at their doorstep (see: the Mycenaean conquest of the Aegean, and the ‘Hyksos’ invasion and conquest of Egypt, as prime examples).

Age of Pisces (Water element, governed by Jupiter and Dionysus; Vishnu and Shiva in the Indic traditions) approx. 260 BCE - 1900 CE -- This is the age we just emerged from and the one that is by far most familiar to those of us living today. The old martial and fiery essence of Aries gave way to the self-sacrificing Saint motif, once Pisces was in full swing. Religion mostly shifted from being praxis-oriented to being centered around affirmed belief in abstract doctrines, i.e. professed faith. In many corners of the Earth, the old "pagan" religions of the prior ages quickly gave way to these now belief-based sectarian movements. The hyper-patriarchy of Aries stuck around and blended into the Piscean paradigm. The primary themes of this Age were unity/oneness, ideological brotherhood, frenzy, mass hysteria, secrecy, utopianism, political skulduggery, "humanity" as a universal ideal, the blending of politics and religion, salvationist doctrines, doomsday cults, hyper-focus on the afterlife at the detriment of worldly life (and other eschatological obsessions). The general trend was the consolidation of religions into top-down, toltalizing systems which dominate every aspect of the followers ordinary lives. Wanton religious intolerance, ideological crusades and inquisitions quickly became the "new normal" by late antiquity and persisted all throughout the middle ages and up into the modern era.

Age of Aquarius (Air element, governed by Saturn and Prometheus) approx. 1900 - 4660 CE -- This is the Age we very recently crossed into, though it will be at least several centuries before the Piscean currents become diminished to the point where they no longer govern religion and ideology around the world. How this age will unfold is a huge unknown, especially given the "weirdness" of Aquarian nature. By that, everything that follows should be seen as wild speculation and probably taken with a grain of salt; on top of that, Aquarius is bound to hurl at least a few curveballs in our general direction. One thing we can say however is that it will be nothing at all like the drug-addled fantasies of 1960s and 70s hippies, who were largely projecting Piscean-utopian fantasies onto the future. Instead of a homogeneous "one brotherhood of humanity" we might a reverse in course toward more independence, idiosyncrasy, and differentiation among peoples. Secession and independence movements could very well dominate politics. If this happens, then it’s going to be an age of "people going their own way" and various permutations of that pattern. Homogeneity of thought across groups will become less and less of a thing as this age comes into full swing, though whether groupthink will dominate within particular groups is anyone’s best guess. At any rate, there will be a lot of different ones!

Religion will once again become more praxis-oriented and less obsessed with shared beliefs and ham-fisted enforcement of doctrinal compliance. Religious convictions will become a personal matter and not so much a communal concern. Religious/Spiritual specialists (clergy, gurus, seers) will become something more akin to guides and helpers, rather than ideological enforcers of yesteryear. The Piscean religions will be forced to adapt or die in this Age. For groups on the leading edge of Aquarian currents, the dispassionate investigation of reality (i.e. science in its true form) and intellectual pursuits will be emphasized over blind faith. Immersive spirituality might become centered around the training of the mind and the connection of an individual to their Genius.

Due to the Saturnine element, the peoples of this ages will struggle greatly with sinking into the all-too-familiar pit of materialism; though the Promethean influence might be a mitigating factor (or a destructive nuisance!), as people will seek out novel means of escaping the materialist ideological straitjacket. We can easily observe today that many forms of high weirdness are on the up-and-up and that the thundering destruction of age-old ways of doing things is even now becoming "the new normal." Idiosyncratic “subcultures” may become a new type of tribalism, and if this comes to be, then the idea that everyone should dress and act the same will be a quaint relic of the distant past. Few will mourn the loss of the Western business suit, which is perhaps the most stifling, conformist, and uncomfortable formal garment ever to see the light of day.

At first there will be much resistance to these new currents, and as long as the techno-industrial systems remain scalable, we may very well see what were once polite “democratic” societies morph into totalitarian police states; we are already beginning to see technology turned against the people and used as a means of mass-enslavement. The global technological superstructure may very well collapse due to a steadily-shrinking supply of energy resources. If this happens it will only further hasten the now-natural urge to break off into splinter groups and differentiate. The old limits of geographical distance and other barriers will come back into play and help provide natural barriers between the new subculture-tribes.

Now in terms of social structures and mores, we can observe that right as Aquarius started coming to play, we started to see the beginnings of the old hyper-patriarchy of Aries finally beginning to wane in cultures science had already taken precedence over faith-based religion. By the late 19th century, we suddenly saw the proliferation of female spiritual leaders and intellectuals, which was something quite foreign to pretty much most cultures for a very long time. Expect female contributions and leadership in religion and spirituality to be something here to stay in this Age. However, the so-called "gender equality" movements of recent history have been plagued with Piscean ways of thinking, as they've been ideological crusades which embraced the opposite extreme of the old norm. As with anything, we could say that the wise way is the Middle Way. As these destructive ideological movements lose their sway over the popular imagination, we should begin to see ideas which promote a healthier balance when it comes to sex/gender issues. Sexual puritanism (a Piscean trait due to the fear/hatred of the body found in many of its religions) may also become a thing of the past, and like above we might see a more balanced approach to this issue, rather than the present-day trend of running head-first into the opposite extreme of sexual licentiousness.

Once again, the above predictions should not be taken too seriously. These are rough guesses at how general patterns and trends might unfold, as opposed to being a concrete speculative timeline of how the future will come to be.
causticus: trees (Default)
An interesting little blurb from a former teacher of mine:

Most religions acknowledge scripturally the existence of angels, demons, nature spirits, etc.  How the modern form of a religion has painted its "magical" founders is usually the result of dogma that developed much later after the Founder died.  By strict definition Zoroaster, Jesus, Moses, Serapis, etc...all were magicians in that they could manifest their Will on a very powerful level that most call supernatural or miraculous.  Whether or not they dressed up and drew circles on the ground is rather irrelevant.   

The best I can do to personally try to understand how they did what they did is to look to the great Magicians and Yogis of today and see how they accomplish the same miracles.  I see little difference superficially between a Yogi in India who says he is God and then walks on water and heals many and a Yogi in ancient Judea who says he is God and walks on Water and heals many.  The only difference esoterically between the two is their karmic dispensation and the Divine missions they incarnated to fulfill.  Likewise if Franz Bardon makes a few quick finger gestures and words and clears a town of a thunderstorm, I have very little reason to believe Jesus did anything else to clear the storm over the Sea, except for maybe having done it on a higher level.  But the same things had to happen for the storm to clear, the same universal laws had to be followed even if God came down and cleared the storm.  Likewise, is it so easy to presume that a "holy man" is anything more divine than a yogi or magician?  Are only religious people bound by God and his Laws, while magicians and yogis somehow usurp his power?  No.  God could stop a magician from doing his miracles just as readily as he could allow a holy man to do them in faith, and vice versa.  The same permissions have to be granted to the magician and yogi as they do a faith healer or prophet.  The only difference is knowledge, and thus accuracy and power.  A yogi can cast a demon out very quickly, with no rituals or prayers and support groups.  A simple clap of the hand and the air is cleared.  It is only because he understands his adversary more. 

Now a quick correction on something said earlier: Religion tends to come from magic, and not the other way around.  Most religious symbolism is a means for the sages of Old to try to communicate to the uninitiated in a harmless way how the universe works and came to be.  The teachings of Moses, Zoroaster, Hermes, Serapis, Buddha, Vashishta, Vyasadeva, Adi Shankara, etc...are more akin to adults trying to teach kids about Life using lots of pictures.


The bolded text in the last paragraph is key.
causticus: trees (Default)
General discussion thread for how to deal with the loneliness issues that tend to creep up as one advances further down this path. The usual etiquette of Ecosphian discussions apply here.
causticus: trees (Default)
The following is bit of a long ramble in response to JMG's jab (pun intended) at the corporate establishment's desperate attempt to browbeat the masses into worshiping lab coats.
https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/131994.html

It seems like the Cult of Technocratic Managerialism that got its glorious start during the FDR years has become dilapidated to the point where it has become a morbid sci-fi horror self-parody. Now this hilarious "Trust the science!!" mantra comes off like the invocation of a desperate Cargo Cult, one willing to do anything to prolong its increasingly-fragile sense of confidence and self-worth; anything to harken back to the good ol' days where 'science' was perpetually on the up and the masses were oh so enthusiastic about material progress! It's like the remaining true believers subconsciously know their days are numbered.

To draw from a favorite mythos of the true believers: The 'USS Technocracy' starship is about to blow; there's hull breaches all over the ship and the warp core has started to leak plasma; yet the command crew is sitting pretty on Deck 1, being protected by a force field around the bridge and they're blissfully in denial that their ship is about to become a cloud of dust and metallic debris; the enlisted crew members on the lower decks are being sucked out into the vacuum of space, but the people up top are each plugging their ears while singing to themselves, "la la la la, I'm not listening!!"

We could say that "Science" (in the cultural-ideological sense) is an egregore (Group Mind Entity), and one that is becoming weaker and more unstable by the year? If we're to draw from occult philosophy, it would seem that less and less ordinary people "believing science" weaken the egregore and make it more a mental reflection of the remaining cult of true believers. Undoubtedly, it's been pop-cultural artifacts like the aforementioned Star Trek mythos, along with countless flashy gizmo advertisements, and copycat entertainment products that have propped up this group mind over the years. By this, I think there may have been a lot of non-deliberate self-sabotage going on here, as many of these entertainment products have been sacrificed to the Woke Cult in recent years. Star Trek itself got turned into a cynical Affirmative Action passion play, with its most recent franchise offering, "Discovery"...one that diehard Trekkies have generally deemed an abomination. So worlds have collided, in a manner of speaking, and the Woke group-mind(which is not particularly 'scientific' .. to put it lightly) has been butting itself into the mental real estate once monopolized by the Science group-mind and thus producing untold amounts of cognitive dissonance for the many mental inhabitants unfortunate enough to caught in this storm.

The field of 'Occult Memetics' has become a fascination of mine (the youtube personality Styxhexenhammer666 coined this term). Thinking about this topic in detail has me realizing just how much of a collective psychotic break the comfortable classes (PMCs) are experiencing right now.

Last week within the same two day window I had both my dad and uncle (both are TV-addicted boomers who unquestioningly believe everything the corporate media talking heads tell them they need to believe) pester me about getting the jab, and in a rather passive-aggressive manner. I can only surmise that there has been a corporate propaganzda blitzkrieg now that it's become apparent that the vaccine supply has vastly outstripped demand. All of the true believers have had their shot already and those outside the science cult have to be either bribed or browbeaten into taking it. Many of us are simply "nope" and this is enraging the cultists to no end. I absolutely refuse to take the jab and a fear my own family members might become increasingly hostile toward this. So I'm left with the choice of either lying to them or simply telling them this isn't up for debate, now buzz off.

No, I'm not wearing a stupid mask unless a business establishment I'm walking into absolutely requires me to do so. And no, I'm not getting an under-tested science experiment jabbed into my arm.
causticus: trees (Default)
From a conversation I was having in a chat recently:

In my own view, Saul of Tarsus (St. Paul of the Christian tradition) would seem to be a rather tragic personage, and on his own abilities and personality, a sort of pseudo-knower (Gnostic). Granted, he must have been quite wise and intuitively-gifted, and probably had a fair number of profound spiritual experiences of his own. However, like many other failed initiates of his era, it seems apparent that he never bothered to master any of the systems of practice he had been involved with prior to starting his own cult (classic blunder of failed initiates). And thus he never effectively dealt with his own ego issues prior to having the bright idea (on the Road to Damascus, surely) of starting his own religion. And predictably, the cult he did found ended up being permanently tainted by his own ego-flaws. Paul could be seen as a classic example of the junior initiate who betrays the mysteries by sharing some of the teachings with the masses; which he most certainly did when he dumbed down some of the inner teachings (which he undoubtedly pilfered from whatever mystery cults he did actually belong) into into silly parables and simple doctrinal talking points. He would have called these digestible tidbits, 'milk for babes.'

Yes, it seems Saul was a rather complicated character. He was caught between two worlds, the Jewish and Hellenic (Platonic, to be more specific), and as a result had an inner identity conflict he tried to resolve though the hybrid cult he ended up trying to spread all over the Mediterranean. I suspect that earlier in his life he was an avid reader of both Plato and Philo's Jewish take on Plato's philosophy. And as I alluded to above, he probably also belonged to one or more Hellenic mystery cults, likely each with a Platonic or Neo-Pythagorean core theme; his lifetime and geographic region would have made a plausible case for him possibly having been a student of the great 1st century CE Neopythagorean sage Apollonius of Tyana, or perhaps a student of an offshoot school of his.

So at some point Saul had the bright idea of trying to convert fellow Jews to his own peculiar, rather dualistic and partially-Judaized interpretation of Platonic doctrines. And when that mostly failed he took his strange new cult doctrine to the non-Jews; mostly the Hellenes of various Anatolian cities of the Roman Empire. And for one reason or another, disaffected Hellenes were eventually joining his cult in droves, though in the letters we're clued into the probable reality that the laity and clergy were taught very different doctrines. In other words, the common rabble, with their vulgar, wordily understanding of reality, were starkly differentiated from the initiates who had tasted the first fruits of Gnosis. At this point in early Christianity, the Knowers and Hearers (to use the old Pythagorean organizational model) were members of the same Church body. At the new religion spread around further and gained more members it started schisming off into different sects. Undoubtedly, there were many hearers who were deemed unsuitable for initiation into the ranks of knowers, but that didn't stop them from thinking they had things figured out on their own, and the more egocentric among them would go off and forms their own churches, sans-knowers. And we all know how history proceeded from there.

I would agree with Nietzsche's assessment of Pauline Christianity being 'Platonism for the people.' This does indeed seem like what Saul was attempting to accomplish in spreading his new cult ideology around the Eastern parts of the empire. But this all raises the question, what did Saul actually himself believe? My best guess is that his beliefs were a combination of what I mentioned above (Judaic Platonism), coupled with a grab-bag of mystery school doctrines which were circulating around during the 1st century. Two primary ideas he would have understood were, (1) the cycle of rebirths human souls experience over countless lifetimes, and (2) the Precession of the Equionixes, which is the esoteric doctrine which informs on the Astrological Ages we experience here on Earth. A thorough understanding of the latter doctrine would inform the initiate that humanity at the time was entering a long 'dark age' and thus the next 6,000 years or so would be a time of sorrow, ignorance, crass materialism, degeneracy, non-virtuous living, and a whole host of other spiritual ills. In other words, a terrible time to incarnate on this planet. Perhaps to Saul, the best viable alternative would be to gain sufficient Gnosis in order to ascend into 'The Kingdom of Heaven' which really was just his own quasi-Judaized way of referring to Plato's realm of Perfect Forms. The idea was, "we must get out NOW, before it's too late!!" And here Saul conveniently borrowed the immanency and urgency of Messianic Jewish time-perception and incorporating it into his own bastardized set of public teachings. He may of purposefully withheld the (true) doctrine of reincarnation from the Hearers, possibly thinking that telling the truth would undermine the sense of urgency he was trying to convey to his followers. Though some of the later, more mystically-inclined Church Fathers like Origen (along with many of the so-called 'Gnostics') would openly profess the reality of reincarnation. Again, the problem with the teaching of reincarnation is that it undermines and subverts the sort of microscopic time scales Abrahamic religions revolve around (this is the #1 reason why the post-Nicene Roman Church tried so virulently to expunge this doctrine from the written record). If there are indeed countless lifetimes available to a human soul to grow and evolve, then the message of "Immediate Salvation in this very lifetime, noowwwwwww!!' is rightly seen as being immensely infantile, especially when foisted upon less-mature human souls.

In summary, I believe Saul of Tarsus was a failed initiate of the higher mysteries and an ardent popularizer of Platonism (or rather, his own understanding of Platonism). He tried in vain to share some of these teachings with the masses and as a result ended up creating countless more problems than he solved. Hell, even the New Testament (a direct product of Paul's teachings) warns against this very act!!

Do not give dogs what is sacred; do not throw your pearls to pigs. If you do, they may trample them under their feet, and turn and tear you to pieces.
-Matthew 7:6

As we know, the original core of initiates that constituted the leaders of early Christian movement were eventually trampled underfoot by the uninitiated literalists and dogmatists who later took over the church and remade it in their own cruddy image.

What a tragic figure indeed Paul was!
causticus: trees (Default)
....well, at least down here in the meat-space, or even in the various psychic/astral planes of phenomenal reality.

The "But, we're all ONE" mantra is perhaps one (sorry for the pun) of the most used and abused and unphilosophical utterances of the New Age-inflected pseudo-spiritual end of contemporary pop culture.

Let's get the first part out of the way; yes, we are indeed "all one" from the standpoint of any Monist type of metaphysical theory. In other words, if we're to assume any validity to Monism, then we are ULTIMATELY all one. But the oneness stops the moment we "sink down" into phenomenal manifestation. Applying metaphysics, we arrive at various schema explaining the various subdivisions of Spirit/Soul. The lower in manifestation we go, the more cluttered, confused, and disorienting components we encounter which keeps Soul/Mind fettered to various transient and ephemeral manifestations of phenomenal interplay.

We could say that the average "human soul" (however one may theoretically slice and dice it) is a confused mess of sense impressions, emotions, impulses, unfulfilled desires, karmic influences which have accumulated over a very long stretch of incarnations, erroneous viewpoints, unskillfull attachments, ect. And in each individual, this manic interplay of phenomena is going to have a slightly different flavor. Each individual is quite different in this respect. And each individual will find that different methods, techniques and approaches for becoming free from their fetters will be more suitable for their own particular condition.

So it seems that Henosis (i.e. merging with "the One," or attaining Moksha, Nirvana, or whatever) is the final end goal for any mystic or devotional spiritual practitioner. But this is indeed a very long mountain climb (to put it lightly) and requires monumental amount of personal effort, discipline, and cultivated merit. In other words, the "great work" sure ain't no walk in the park. Our spoiled-rotten generations of recent history want instant gratification in practically every area, including spirituality. As if muttering the aforementioned catch-phrase over and over again will somehow magically evaporate all of a person's phenomenal impurities, cruddy karma, and delusions....yeah.

So yeah, before every being in existence attains the Ultimate (in how ever many of quadrillions of eons that might be), there's going to be endless repeating cycles of wars, stupid arguments, idiotic opinions, people behaving totally off their rocker, ugly people, big fish chomping on little fish, mounds of fecal matter, and whatever other unflattering affairs and objects one can think of right off the top of their Lower Nous. Right now down here on grubby little Earth, perhaps the sane thing to do is try and mitigate the less-than-stellar aspects of our everyday habits and the circumstances we all have to deal with in one way or another. And yes, that might require naming and recognizing those things.
causticus: trees (Default)
"...according to occult philosophy, your astral body — the body of desires, emotions, imagination, and dreams — gradually attunes itself to whatever state of consciousness you favor in life. These correspond to different sub-planes of the astral plane, ranging from the uppermost sub-plane of creative imagination and love, down to the lowest sub-plane of unreasoning violent passions. Death is a complex process; first you shed your physical body, obviously, and then a short time after you shed your etheric body — the body of life energy — in what’s called the second death. At that point your consciousness and mental sheath are enclosed in your astral body, and it gravitates to whatever sub-plane on the astral corresponds to your habitual state of consciousness. If you spent the bulk of your life wallowing in unreasoning violent passions, well, that’s where you end up, and it’s not very pleasant. If you spent the bulk of your life oriented toward the upper astral sub-planes, that’s where you end up, and it’s a lot more pleasant.

This is also a temporary condition. After a while — time is difficult to measure there, as it’s subjective time — you shed your astral body, and rise to the lower end of the mental plane. It’s from there that you begin the descent into incarnation again, gathering a new astral body out of the raw material of the astral plane, a new etheric body out of the raw material of the etheric plane, and a new physical body likewise (the latter two, of course, with the help of your future parents).

The notions of heaven and hell found in mainstream religions are blurred and garbled versions of the astral plane encountered in the after-death state. The big differences, of course, are (1) where you end up isn’t a matter of punishment or reward, you simply gravitate to the level that corresponds to your overall state of consciousness; (2) it’s a temporary event, not a permanent destiny; and (3) you don’t get assigned to this or that state depending on whether you happened to belong to the right church, or prayed to the right god, or followed the right set of moral preachments."
causticus: trees (Default)
John Michael Greer answering a question (from this week's Magic Monday) on what exactly the Age of Aquarius is:

The sign Aquarius is ruled by Uranus, the planet of individuality, eccentricity, high weirdness, revolution, radical change, and mass death. Unity and harmony (as well as madness, mass hysteria, and totalitarianism) are correspondences of Neptune, the ruler of Pisces, the age that ended in 1879. So people who expect the age of Aquarius to bring us another round of Piscean values are barking up the wrong stump. As the age of Aquarius deepens around us, we can expect less unity and harmony (as well as less madness, mass hysteria and totalitarianism), and more people veering off in weird directions without worrying about what other people think. Oh, and lots of localized disasters, political revolutions, and other sudden changes.


Yeah, not at all what people still stick in Pisces mode imagine it to be.
causticus: trees (Default)
This is just my personal views at the moment; I'm not super firm of dogmatic about it and thus it's subject to change/develop as I learn more:

Basically I believe in at least some form of reincarnation and karma, and of course that the soul is eternal. And by that, I do believe that when human individuals die their consciousness continues on after the death of their physical body.

Now, according to what I understand thus far, the afterlife experience of each individual will vary, and it will vary according to myriad conditions.

The death of the physical body technically isn't "death" per-se, rather it's just the first death, which is the physical body ceasing to be a vessel for an individual life force and various layers of subtle bodies.After the death of the physical body, usually the vital body (life force, composed of what is known in eastern traditions as Qi and Prana) is the next to go; it dissipates and then the soul sheds the last of its material form from the lifetime it is now leaving behind. And then what the individual has is their astral body and the mental sheath that connects the soul to the higher realms of spirit.

Then the astral body exists in an interim, dream-like state for a period that varies according to both the karma and the spiritual development level of the individual. In this dreamlike state, the soul gets to review imagery from its past life and if that life was particularly troubled or evil, this can be a rather unpleasant experience. However, if the life was one of relative virtue, then this experience might be quick and painless. The term "purgatory" might somewhat accurately describe this state.

After this interim state of "purifications" is the second death, then a period of rest where the soul ascends to a realm that's high enough where they can't experience mundane pain, sorrow, guilt, ect. They get to further review their past several life or so and exist in a kind of blissful state. But the immature soul in this rest state will eventually grow bored and restless and their desires for material phenomena will start bubbling up to the surface of their mental activity. And then the process of having an earthly rebirth arranged for them will begin and they will incarnate into a new body when conditions are right for whatever their karmic situation might be. And it all starts over again.

It's my belief that now with so many darn humans incarnated on the planet right now, the afterlife rest period is rather short for most human souls. As in something possibly lasting only a few months to several years in earth time.

And this could possibly be a source of lot of the collective insanity we're seeing right now.
However, some sort of catastrophe or mass population reduction even it likely on the horizon sometime within the next couple centuries, or perhaps sooner. Then most people will get the extended between-lives rest period they need to process all those crazy experiences from many lives jammed together one after another in such short succession.

Now, for those souls who are much more advanced in their spiritual development than the average human, their afterlife experience will be quite different. Instead of being in a dreamlike state after the death of their physical and vital bodies, their astral state will be fully conscious and lucid. They will have full control and agency in this state and even be able to interact/communicate with incarnate humans on earth, if they so choose (but almost always they won't do this unless it's some other advanced spiritual practitioner they're talking to, perhaps a disciple of theirs)

People who practice a lot of mysticism (like yoga, meditation, ect.) and/or ritual magic will be able to attain these types of lucid afterlife experiences; granted they are advanced along far enough in their practices.And, according to several different bodies of teachings, those souls that are super advanced will have shed all of their attachments of worldly phenomena and will become totally liberated from the cycle of rebirths.
causticus: trees (Default)
In my view, paranoia and fundamentalism so often go hand in hand. Take internet conspiracy culture as a prime example of this. One can find no shortage of youtube videos pages and webpages full of rantings and raving about "occult" and "pagan" symbolism being everywhere in pop culture. The cranks, lunatics and opportunists peddling this paranoia would insist that these symbols are mendaciously hidden in plain sight by a cabal of dark-evil-elite conspirators who have infiltrated mass media and big entertainment and are thus using their influence to openly gloat about all the secret occult knowledge they supposedly possess. And go to any video on youtube about any spiritual or religious topic imaginable and you'll see the comments section full of the same type of rabidly-incoherent, frothing-at-the-mouth rants, typically colored by a motley assortment of out-of-context Bible quotations, often in the form of just one or two isolated verses.

The central paranoia of the Christian fundamentalist in particular, is that every type of expression out there in the big bad world of pop culture, media and shared ideas, is an affront to or an attack upon the paranoid person's adopted version of whatever variant of Christianity they happen to adhere to. And of course there are those snowflakes who claim not to follow any particular domination; in their own words their rationalization might be something along the lines of, "I just follow the Bible, plain and simple!" Well, quite simple expect for the annoying fact that there are now more than 40,000 different ways of interpreting that "plain and simple" body of scripture. If this many disagreements do exist, then which one is correct? By what standard is an interpretation correct or incorrect? Who exactly should be vested with the authority of determining which interpretation is the most correct? (Entire massive bloody wars have been fought over this very question) Come on now, if the Bible was a clear and unambiguous message any average Joe could easy understand, then why isn't there just one Christian sect? The clear answer is that anyone claiming that they follow "nothing but the Bible" is either totally full of shit or they have self-deluded their mind into a pretzel.

Essentially, modern Westerners are supremely averse to genuine spirituality, and this is especially true for the most fervently "religious" Westerners. They are in fact the greatest enemies of spirituality. Modern modern people are materialists in one form or another. At least secular modern people are just ambivalent about or lackadaisically dismissive of spirituality, as opposed to wanting to wage "holy" wars against it. Literalist Christian fundamentalists are materialists and empiricists when it comes to everything in existence except the what they believe their scriptures say. And even then they glean a mostly-materialist worldview from the Bible. Jesus Christ **had** to have been a literal historical person, and the events depicted in the Gospel narrative **had** to have happened literally, word-for-word. The oh-so-lofty concepts of allegory and archetypes be damned!

People in general tend to be fearful toward what they cannot (or simply refuse to) understand. And thus they may project and lash out all their inner insecurities and psychic impurities toward anything reeking of higher wisdom. Think of the envious student who speaks using the worst of profanities against the teacher who flunked them for poor performance. And with the modern cultural take on Western individualism, so many people are cursed with a puerile entitlement complex that beams into their minds the notion that they are "owed" things for the mere feat of existing as an **individual**. And thus, in the realm of metaphysical matters, the Truth should simply fall into one's lap, regardless of their own particularity moral character, in-born temperament or level of accumulated merit. Nothing should be rightfully earned through effort and struggle; everything should be freely given out, because reasons.

The age-old Master/Apprentice dynamic has been pissed upon many times over by the hyper-entitled man/woman-child Westerner. And perhaps we could state that the 60s counterculture "revolution" only fanned the flames of this noxious adolescent mentality; everything thereafter became all about "me, me, me, me, myself, and I." The postwar (WWII) economic bonanza, coupled with the rapid advance in material high-technology, was the gasoline that made these flames 100x higher. And now with the internet, where everyone had all the information (or porn) they could ever want at their fingertips, the demand for instant answers to everything is even more magnified than before.

The self-righteous fundamentalist feels a seething rage toward any type of religious knowledge that is directly out of his reach. According his passion-ridden materialist mind, if **he** doesn't see it then it simply isn't there. And anyone who does insist it is indeed there must have some kind of hidden, nefarious agenda up his sleeve. Obvious the fundamentalist's personal God is an egalitarian and democrat who freely puts out all the secrets of the universe for anyone to effortlessly comprehend without any serious effort required. Within the paradigm of modern materialist science, if the scientist (in all likelihood, a glorified technician or doctor of rote memorization) can't read something with the instruments available to the practitioners of his field, then the proposed phenomenon in question simply doesn't exist, rather than being something that may or may not exist.

Homo Hubris is the man of the current era.

Profile

causticus: trees (Default)Causticus

September 2025

S M T W T F S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
2122 2324252627
282930    

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 4th, 2026 07:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios