causticus: trees (Default)
I honestly have no idea what the next spiritual paradigm is going to look like, as far as its core teachings, practices, and aesthetic themes are concerned. In general, making accurate predictions about the future is not one of my gifts. But I do think that any astute observer of history and the human condition can spot trend and patterns and get a general sense of which direction the wind might start blowing tomorrow.

One thing I have seen brewing is the vigorous rejection of nearly everything the Baby Boomer generation stood for, metaphysically, politically, and aesthetically. I’m not going to lay out a laundry list of every misdeed and act of stupidity that can be plausibly pinned on the boomers; such would be the thing of an entire book (or encyclopedic set of volumes!), and there have already been plenty of authors and commentators who have thoroughly covered that topic anyway.

If I’m to offer up a listicle of any sort, it would consist of a few hypothetical trends that might become features of the next spiritual wave. Let’s take a hack at this:

1. So many of the boomers like to believe “hey, we’re all the same, maaaan.” (Not) sorry to say, but we may soon see a rejection of many egalitarian (particularly, blank-slatist) ideas about human nature and the human spiritual condition, and a subsequent return to hierarchical cosmo-theologies and observation-based takes on the human condition. For Christians, this simply means a return to long-established doctrines like original sin, or at least recognition that humanity is mostly alienated from higher spiritual truths. In some corners of present-day occultism and philosophy, there seems to be a much-needed return to recognizing the Platonic tradition as being both fundamental and essential to Western Spirituality. Notice that in boomer Neo-occultism, and in New Age, and Neopagan movements, Platonic metaphysics barely gets a nod, since Platonic cosmology is rather hierarchical and rightly notates humanity’s humble place in the grand cosmological scheme of things. This is because spiritual boomers by and large are Luciferians who worship their own egos. It’s no wonder that in boomer occultism, metaphysical miscreants and dabblers like Aleister Crowley and Gerald Gardner got all sorts of airtime, while serious teachers like Dion Fortune and Manly P. Hall were barely acknowledged. The higher-IQ end of the boomer generation enthusiastically traded traditional metaphysics for nihilistic existentialism, atheism, subjectivism, secular humanism, and postmodernist relativism, and attitudes stemming from all those things combined eventually filtered down to the more average and lower intellects among them and the next couple generations to follow.

2. There will likely be a (re)segregation of the sexes in many religious and spiritual spaces. Yeah, the sexual revolution and that great cultural catastrophe known as feminism has failed, bigtime. The ham-fisted forced infiltration of women into male spaces has spectacularly failed as well. We’ve had to re-learn the hard way that men and women are indeed different, and that members of each respective sex learn, communicate, and conduct their affairs in different ways. Mindlessly and carelessly blending the two sexes in organized activities just creates chaos and anarcho-tyranny. The wish to dissolve boundaries, differences, and distinctions was one of the major themes of boomer spirituality, probably owing to a rather shallow reading of various Eastern mystical teachings. We can see exactly where that mentality has gotten us. Within religious organization, putting women in magisterial roles has proven to be an unmitigated disaster. There’s a damn good reason why most Mainline Protestant churches today care about little more than flying rainbow flags, screeching woke bromides from the rafters, and going on and on about how terrible and evil the Orange Emperor is. The average age in those congregations likely hovers around 75. Meanwhile, younger people interested in something resembling spiritual discipline are joining Traditionalist Catholic and Orthodox Churches; y’know, the sorts of places where the Priest is still allowed to tell you what a woman is.

3. Spirituality may once again become something much grater than a vehicle for individual navel-gazing and narcissistic self-expression. Perhaps a great emphasis on collective purpose will come to replace so much of the self-indulgent nonsense that defined boomer spirituality; as we know, 1001 boats each going their separate way does not a community make; the catastrophic failure of most boomer utopian communes from the 60s and 70s clearly illustrates this. Instead of chasing unrealistic ideals, perhaps the emerging spiritualties will focus on more imminent, attainable goals.

4. The emphasis on tangible action over mere virtue-signaling and platitude-bombing (usually in service of naked self-interest). Hopefully, we’ll once again learn to walk the walk, not just talk the talk. Perhaps a greater emphasis on serious introspection will become a thing. Of course moral hypocrisy will always be with us, as those hypocritical, moralizing-yet-sinmaxxing pastors and spiritual gurus aren’t going away any time soon.

5. Right now we’re seeing the beginnings of a renewed sense of respect and reverence for time-honored traditions and the great sacrifices our ancestors bequeathed to us. This will only increase more over time as more and more boomers leave this world and pass into the afterlife. One of the hallmarks of the postmodern Neopagan project was the wholesale rejection of the entire Judeo-Christian part of our Western civilizational heritage; in practice this results in antinomianism and the “rebel without a clue” mentality, because such a significant part of our history occurred under the auspices of Christian moral and social order. This re-embrace of our heritage doesn’t necessarily mean everyone going back to dogmatic Christianity. Rather, we can say that emerging and evolving pluralistic spiritualties will at least acknowledge the good things Christian traditions have given us. Some groups may even come to re imagine the Bible as a collection of sibylline oracles to draw varying degree of spiritual inspiration from, rather than an infallible, literally-interpreted text that is the final authority on every topic imaginable.

6. We may finally see a move away from the shrill and rigid moral universalism that’s been a norm for a very long time. Boomers probably thought their spiritualities were moving away from this, but instead just replaced existing forms of shrill moral universalism with their own brand of shrill moral universalism. Some of us have realized that it’s all cringe, not just one or another particular flavor of it. It seems the Aquarian energies are ever-increasing in our collective consciousness and as a result, the various forms of monolatry and simplistic spiritual formulae will likely become less of a common feature. The boomers arrogantly proclaimed, “all you need is love!” Yeah, umm, not really. In actuality, the world can be a very hostile place full of unfriendly people and groups who will jump at any chance to come grab your stuff (and possibly kill you in the process) when they think they can get away with it. Kudos to Heathenry for re-introducing the concepts of boundaries and self-protective measures having a sacral quality to them; hopefully this carries over into at least some of the emerging spiritualties.

7. By that, will there be a return of in-group cultural particularism? The liberal half of the boomer generation is real big on xenophilia (their seeming-love of foreign cultures) and a resulting shunning and hatred of their own Western cultural heritage. Of course, this attitude didn’t actually start with the boomers, but first became a thing in late 19th century occult and spiritual circles, when the embrace of newly-discovered (to Westerners) Eastern spiritual traditions (Orientalism) became all the rage. By that time, centuries of Western rationalism, scientific discoveries, and the resulting critical examination of Christian doctrines and the Biblicist worldview, rendered a dogmatic and literalist interpretation of the religion’s teachings a nonstarter for most educated and intelligent people. Said xenophila was a reaction to “the death of God” and boomers cranked that reaction to 11. Boomers are often criticized for appropriating Eastern spiritual practices without understanding their cultural or historical contexts. For example, yoga and meditation are sometimes reduced to trendy lifestyle choices, stripped of their deeper philosophical roots. The sort of Westernized (i.e. secularized) Buddhism that some boomers embraced and promoted, became more about therapy and self-help than about spiritual liberation from trappings of the material world. In fact, many boomer “Buddhists” are in fact atheists who don’t believe in any higher spiritual reality. Similar to many New Age spiritual groups, the boomer leaders of Westernized Buddhist groups run them like money-hungry business enterprises (The money part is of course an American phenomenon, and not necessarily a boomer-specific one). I think the realization that we, as Westerners, have very rich traditions of our own to draw from, will begin to skin in more and more. The impending “Second Religiosity” of Spenglerian historical theory, will likely come to fully embrace this notion.

8. I’m probably failing to think of a lot of other good points that should be on this list, but I think I did an OK job summing up the major themes and how those themes might become undone in the near-to-distant future.
causticus: trees (Default)
Not long after I first delved into the magical side of John Michael Greer’s (JMG) work, I began contemplating the idea of getting involved with organized Revival Druidry. Eventually, after about a year of somewhat-steady SOP practice and casual occult study, I joined the Ancient Order of Druids of America (AODA). However, to this day, I have yet to become active there, in terms of starting their curriculum, or getting involved in their online forum and chat group. I joined, thinking they were the last "sane" organization of this type still around. And by sane, I mean not totally overtaken by the woke mind virus that has consumed nearly every alt-spirituality organization. I figured that AODA came to be in its current form largely thanks to the great efforts of JMG in saving the order from near-death and rebuilding it into a robust and active organization. Granted, he rebuilt the order long before the general culture shifted its collective focus to politics away from non-political things. Before this shift (c. 2013), most organized human activities here in the US, be it hobbies, pop-culture fandoms, religious groups, sports clubs, ect. were primarily focused on whatever the actual purpose of their group was. The intrusion of outside politics tended to be minimal. Well, not so today!!

Vibes Do Tell

When I first signed up for AODA, I read over its literature quite meticulously so as to get an overall feel of the organization’s “vibe.” I tend to be very cagey and cautious when it comes to getting involved with any new group. Being already quite familiar with Revival Druidry, what I read in the literature wasn’t all that surprising. But a few things rubbed me the wrong way. I could tell that the overall group culture leaned pretty far to the left. The typical “progressive” and “PC” values were right there, front and center, though not in any kind of aggressive or obnoxious form. There was no obvious “Cultural Marxism” (i.e. “oppressor vs. oppressed” demographic conflict rhetoric) that has become the mainstay of most of the Neopagan scene in recent years. But I saw the seeds of this eventual intrusion lying in wait. It was clear much of the membership base came from the typical middle-class “PMC” university-educated background. People in this cultural bubble are usually dialed into the ubiquitous Neoliberal mass media echo chamber, and thus their political and cultural beliefs on any given day tend to be whatever the mainstream media feeds them; even if last month’s “news” totally contradicts this week’s “news.” Granted, conservatives are dialed into their own media echo chamber, and their own “news” parroting behavior is very little different from that of the left’s. But I don’t have space or patience to further explore the topic of media critique, so I’ll leave that off right here.

Woke Progressivism Consumes All

So even that vibe didn’t deter me from considering to start the curriculum at some point. But life got in the way and various duties and distractions became a barrier to me being able to devote my undivided attention to what would be a very involved grade-advancement process. So that non-active state persisted for many months as I kept weighing the pro’s and con’s of getting involved. And then one day, on one of these Ecosophia-adjacent DW blogs, I read an interesting comment that suggested something I had suspected would eventually happen to AODA. To paraphrase the comment, “AODA is currently imploding from wokeness.” Of course, I must acknowledge that this was an anonymous comment, and taken at face value, is merely a rumor coming from one person who claims to be a member of the group. Since I’m not involved in the group’s discussion spaces, I have no real way of conforming or denying the rumor. But, if there is any truth to the rumor, I have to say I’m not surprised at all. Circling back to the group’s literature, I remember quite clearly being a bit off-put by overall writing style of the contributing authors: the sheer amount of wishy-washy relativism, permissiveness (the seeming urge to be 'inclusive' of everything under the sun that doesn’t oppose progressivism), and general female-orientation to the whole affair. These attributes are quite typical of new age, neopagan, and alt-spirituality groups in this era; all which are cultural offshoots of the 1960’s counterculture. Basically, the Druid Revival in its current form, despite its “Mesopagan” roots, is firmly adjacent to the Neopagan scene; one that happens to be in a state of full-blown collapse right now. Thus I’ve concluded that it's a not good idea to get involved with any of these groups right now, as they've all been infected by the aforementioned woke virus, which itself seems to be merely a symptom of the collapse of the Neoliberal Order, and the Professional-Managerial Class (PMC) which serves as the overseer class of this regime. Because of these monumental cultural forces at play, I’m loathe to blame the leadership of these DR organizations for what’s currently happening. The current Grand Archdruid of AODA seems like a very nice and wise person. But she can’t control the kind of media and other pop-culture influences the broader membership consumes on a daily basis. She can’t control which friends, family, and work colleagues each member fraternizes with. After all, one of the central ethical planks of Revival Druidry is to not employ the methods of mind-control cults!! At the end of the day, people are going to do what they are going to do, and in reality this usually means going along with whatever herdthink prevails among one’s own subculture or social class.

So, HYPOTHETICALLY, if say 65% of AODA's membership goes woke and starts demanding the leadership make woke ideology the organization’s main stated purpose for existing, there’s nothing the leadership can do except, (a) capitulate to the mob’s demands and make the organization officially woke, which is what happened to ADF, (b) resign and walk away, leaving the organization in the hands of a new woke leadership, or (c) immediately purge all the wokesters and brace for impact; (d) quietly disband the organization and wait for all the culture war insanity to die down before re-forming the group. Unless the leadership has an iron cohones, super thick skin (not afraid of hurting people’s feelings), and knack for decisiveness, (c) ain’t going to happen, and probably not (d) either. Option (c) seems rather un-Druidly anyway, since the leader would have to become a Grand Inquisitor and devote their time and energy to engaging in counter-witchhunts. A weak or negligent leader will often go with (a), naively thinking they can appease the mob and comply their way out of mass hysteria. It’s perhaps (b) which would be the most foolish choice of all, as it will result in wokesters taking over and essentially destroying the organization and its brand/symbolism, and possibly contaminating the group’s egregore to the point of no return. Overall, it seems like anything but (d) is the makings of a lose-lose situation.

Without Groves, What's the Point?

On a more personal note, even if AODA wasn't compromised (which may be the case still, as I'm going on just a rumor), I still think that participating probably wouldn't give me much more than I'd get from self-study and self-initiation. The organization itself is rather small and as a result there's very few local groves that actually exist. One of the big advantages I'd see from joining a Druid Order would be the opportunity to be part of a local grove. But, fearing the aforementioned rumor is likely true to some extent, getting involved with a local grove probably wouldn't be all the helpful or desirable for me given the sort of left-progressive culture that permeates these groups. No, I most certainly don't want to be a part of any human activity where I have to constantly walk on eggshells around the other participants, out of fear of saying something "offensive" to whatever The Current Thing deems offensive this week. And if I'm really looking for peer support in this work, I honestly think at this point the Ecosophia/MM commentariat is more than sufficient.

Going Along to Get Along vs. Going Against the Grain

To reiterate something I was getting at above, I think even the best and well-meaning organizations within the Neopagan/Alt-Spirituality fold are essentially defenseless against the woke onslaught. It's not so much these groups get "infiltrated" by wokesters; rather it's the membership base that has been in these groups all along is constantly downloading mental "software updates" via their preferred media echo chamber, and what typically happens is that next week the The Current Thing updates to some new cause-du-jour, and the rank and file start making demands on the leadership to "take a stand" against whatever The Current Thing is raging at the moment. If the leadership is evasive or does nothing, an even bigger stink is made until they capitulate; if still nothing is done, some kind of split or schism with the group happens and the "old faction" which refuses to get with the times is quickly denounced as being complicit or sympathetic with whatever the mob happens to be shrieking about, thus the “brace for impact” quip above. I think in most cases, otherwise-well-meaning leadership is weak or simply afraid of negative publicity or people being offended, thus they fold. And thus another one bites the dust.

Sadly, I believe the Druid Revival (as a group activity) will not survive the cultural collapse we’re going through right now. If it’s to re-form some time in the future after the dust finally settles, it must rise from the ashes in a new form; a form that is as distant as possible from anything reeking of Neopagan, New Age, Boomerism, or Neoliberal “Progressive” aesthetics and values.
causticus: trees (Default)
It's pretty much common knowledge (among those why pay attention to such matters) that much of what passes for spirituality in America has become highly commercialized, and as a result of that, intellectually-vacuous and polyannish in character. The so-called "New Age Guru" who is almost entirely money-driven is an all-too-common trope these days.

In my own estimation there is a very simple explanation for this. Namely, that the act of providing religious or spiritual guidance, instruction, services, ect., outside the confines of a well-established religious organization*, is-all-but impossible without the use of a revenue-generation scheme of one sort or another. Basically, the spiritual service provider needs to put food on the table and a roof over their head just like everyone else does. This is especially true of the person in question is going to provides these services on a full-time basis; as opposed to a mere hobbyist who provides these services only in their free time away from their day job, who might have the opportunity to provide pro-bono services to a select few.

So our 'free-range' spiritual teacher isn't going to be working for some large institution that will provide him lodging and a small salary to cover living basics. Nor does he have a wealthy King, Duke, or other Aristocrat to graciously serve as his patron and cover his living costs. No, he must procure these things all on his own, which means he has to run his service like a business. And the priority recipients of his services will be those with the greatest ability to pay the costs of services up front. And thus he if he is the least bit business savvy, he must market his services in a way that attracts paying clients. He will present his business in a manner that caters to the cultural biases and aesthetic tastes of his target clientele. And as a result, he is going to think less of how to market his services to potential clients of more modest means.

This is precisely why we see so much of contemporary alt-spirituality seeming to pander to the collective narcissism of the affluent classes who are able to afford the types of services, seminars and consultation that fit the above profile. Instead of of a message like "stoically battle your lower nature and uglier tendencies, and gain knowledge by shedding your ignorance and delusions..." we get something more along the lines of "discover your inner child and unleash that shining greatness you never knew you had!" All of this is why Alt-Spirituality by and large panders and caters to the Professional-Managerial Class (PMC) many of us in the know love to lampoon a lot these days. Be it Neopaganism, Secular "Buddhism", Soccer Mom Yoga, or whatever New New Age Seminar Fad of the Week is now hot, it's all fundamentally governed by the same formula.

On the flipside of all of these, we get many cases of those who are seeking out something more authentic and potent calling out anyone and everyone who charges money for their services. I've seen the mantra uttered a few times, "a true teacher would never charge for spiritual wisdom!" This is true to some extent, but on a practical level is simply impossible in today's modern western society. As I mentioned above, spiritual instructors have to eat too. And it might suck greatly that we simply lack institutional support structures for genuine spiritual systems; but the cruddy situation we're stuck in is what it is. Everything about modern Anglo culture in particular is commercially-focused. We're all expected to be successful merchants first and foremost. How many Americans are willing to financially support religious organizations that unapologetically denounce merchant values and commercialism as being the be-all/end-all of existence? Yeah, fat chance.

So he will have to charge for his services or instruction materials and prioritize paying customers over any begging charity cases, but at the same time he can consciously commit to living a modest lifestyle (sorry, no gold-plated megachurch or bamboo-chic island retreat to lord over) and setting aside some time to people who could really use his help. I guess the 'right' idea is to make some money, but not too much.


---
* this is not to say that established religious organizations are not driven by money or profit motives. In so many cases they are indeed, though large organizations tend to provide better opportunities for those would be service-providers who are motivated by more selfless concerns.
causticus: trees (Default)
....well, at least down here in the meat-space, or even in the various psychic/astral planes of phenomenal reality.

The "But, we're all ONE" mantra is perhaps one (sorry for the pun) of the most used and abused and unphilosophical utterances of the New Age-inflected pseudo-spiritual end of contemporary pop culture.

Let's get the first part out of the way; yes, we are indeed "all one" from the standpoint of any Monist type of metaphysical theory. In other words, if we're to assume any validity to Monism, then we are ULTIMATELY all one. But the oneness stops the moment we "sink down" into phenomenal manifestation. Applying metaphysics, we arrive at various schema explaining the various subdivisions of Spirit/Soul. The lower in manifestation we go, the more cluttered, confused, and disorienting components we encounter which keeps Soul/Mind fettered to various transient and ephemeral manifestations of phenomenal interplay.

We could say that the average "human soul" (however one may theoretically slice and dice it) is a confused mess of sense impressions, emotions, impulses, unfulfilled desires, karmic influences which have accumulated over a very long stretch of incarnations, erroneous viewpoints, unskillfull attachments, ect. And in each individual, this manic interplay of phenomena is going to have a slightly different flavor. Each individual is quite different in this respect. And each individual will find that different methods, techniques and approaches for becoming free from their fetters will be more suitable for their own particular condition.

So it seems that Henosis (i.e. merging with "the One," or attaining Moksha, Nirvana, or whatever) is the final end goal for any mystic or devotional spiritual practitioner. But this is indeed a very long mountain climb (to put it lightly) and requires monumental amount of personal effort, discipline, and cultivated merit. In other words, the "great work" sure ain't no walk in the park. Our spoiled-rotten generations of recent history want instant gratification in practically every area, including spirituality. As if muttering the aforementioned catch-phrase over and over again will somehow magically evaporate all of a person's phenomenal impurities, cruddy karma, and delusions....yeah.

So yeah, before every being in existence attains the Ultimate (in how ever many of quadrillions of eons that might be), there's going to be endless repeating cycles of wars, stupid arguments, idiotic opinions, people behaving totally off their rocker, ugly people, big fish chomping on little fish, mounds of fecal matter, and whatever other unflattering affairs and objects one can think of right off the top of their Lower Nous. Right now down here on grubby little Earth, perhaps the sane thing to do is try and mitigate the less-than-stellar aspects of our everyday habits and the circumstances we all have to deal with in one way or another. And yes, that might require naming and recognizing those things.
causticus: trees (Default)
By: Xōtlos Mizathtēlos

Because Neo-Paganism and New-Age in general is a largely western phenomenon, it has baggage from Christian thought, Premodern Christianity had an extreme focus on ideas like "Original Sin" and over-focused on Expiation, forgiveness etc as well nonesense like "One True Faith", extreme dogmatic fideism etc. As a result, New Age religion seems to (in reaction) reject any idea of Sin as well as any conception of Dogma or even Truth. With this, it became a huge "no-judge" zone, where anyone could do anything, as long as it made them "happy". Which is itself, a result of misinterpretations of Ancient "Western", Eastern and Abrahamic conceptions of "peace" and/or esctactic union with the Divine.

Which leads to my next point: if you deny any truth and replace it with being "happy", then you essentially replace the Gods with "positive energy". The only Dogma of New Age spirituality is "don't hurt my feelings". Which drove conversation away from Truth and towards personal pleasure, personal pleasure at any cost, even if it means covering your eyes and shouting "lalalalalalala".

All of this was pushed further, by the Egoism of many New Age practitioners, who reduce all spirituality to some lower psychological "sub-conscious" thing. Which makes the source of all understanding of the Gods, the Ego. Thus, the will of the Gods is not based on Higher Principle, but instead on the whims of the Ego, and is driven not towards Unity with the Gods, but towards pleasure and "happiness". (None of this is to speak on the actual teachings of most of the early New-Agers, which were often the opposite of such a self centered world view)

I should state, I am not pro-dogmatic fideism. I am also not an enemy of happiness or psychological interpretations of the Divine. I just recognize these that there is a truth beyond the subjective experience of the Ego.
causticus: trees (Default)
The American Vedic Spiritual Teacher Sri Acharya coined the term, "Radical Universalism"...which is the fallacy-ridden new age sentimentality which blindly asserts (more like, passive-aggressively whines) that all religions and spiritual paths are of equal merit and teach the same thing, everything in general is the same, because...like we're all just one anyway, and thus the act of critically discerning one thing from another is just plain MEAN and INSENSITIVE, yada yada yada. Radical Universalism is in fact an insidious doctrine that has proven quite useful in neutering mass consciousness and thus making it much easier for the sociopathic and amoral elites to further mentally (and physically) enslave the masses. When you're no longer allowed to judge one thing from another (except for differentiating members of the equalitarian cult from heretics/apostates, and other ideological enemies), there is no effective way to even identify your oppressors, much less fight back against them. Abrahamism, Marxism and New Age BS are all just different types of sheep-herding memetic technology.

A Video here elaborating on what exactly Radical Universalism means:

Page generated Jan. 5th, 2026 01:36 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios