causticus: trees (Default)
Are the progressive fanatics who run most of the major Silicon Valley tech companies in self-destruct mode? From P:

It's almost beyond comprehension the seismic [expletive]-storm that Jack and his band of social justice idiots at Patreon unleashed on their own dumb asses. Just another reminder that the lunatics on the left will always wind their way to utter self-destruction if left unchecked. Consider yourself checked (and checkmated) all you [expletives] at Patreon, Facebook, Twitter and beyond. You've issued your last shadowbanning denial, and you [expletive-verb'd] your company and your employees over in the process.


Some finer analysis here may hearken back to the "Social Threefolding" concept I laid out in the previous post. I think what we're seeing now regarding the cumulative effects from last 3 years or so of hyper-progressive ideological fervor, is the Cultural Sphere beginning to assert itself over both the Political and Economic Spheres. And this is not necessarily by top-down conspiratorial design. What we are seeing is a cultural movement that's become consumed by a moral panic, or rather a cluster[expletive] of interlocking moral panics. These are storms not so different from weather systems; they gain momentum, wreak their havoc and then eventually exhaust themselves of energy and die down. Anyone remotely schooled in esoteric might understand the idea that emotions are just like weather patterns.



Silicon Valley has been collectively engaging in precisely the type of cathartic emotional outburst we can see in the video above. Their progressive ideology is little different in character from that of a religion; in this case a very dogmatic, evangelical, and fanatical one. Low-T Left Coast bugman tech CEOs like Jack Conte of Patreon are men of deep faith; we're now at the point where the deep religiosity of such people supercede their pragmatic or even economic concerns. From a business perspective this spells nothing but ruin; one cannot run a for-profit business when their religious motives are in the driver's seat. Of course, many of these tech companies don't even break even on their balance sheets; they stay alive as long as their billionaire investors are pumping money into the company coffers. A deep-pocked investor may have motives that go beyond simple profitability, but only so much. In the media business there have been plenty of examples of publications that never managed to make any money, yet the investor(s) kept the media outlet alive for vanity or propagandistic purposes. I'm not sure this "business" model will work for tech companies in the long run however. A company that keeps making dumb financial decisions and losing money/customers, will eventually find itself in the corporate graveyard. I predict that when the moral panic(s) die down, many of these hyped-up tech companies will be history and we'll be seeing a sizable group of hyper-religious tech workers and entrepreneurs grovelling for jobs at companies that are actually solvent and have a reliable, realistic business model.

At the end of the day, the Cultural Sphere can only run the Economic sphere in a Theocratic system. When the people are allowed to choose what to believe and not believe, it's impossible for Theocratic system to assert any kind of monopolistic power over the general public. This whole mess we're seeing now is going to crash and burn sooner or later.

This is yet another example of: Get Woke, Go Broke.
causticus: trees (Default)
Unless of course we consider the Global-Oligarch establishment to be a party, which they are in a sense. But for the sake of this entry, let's stick to the conventional definition of partisanship, i.e. that of official political parties and ideological factions.

Anyway, in the face is what's now an unrelenting assault on independent political commentators with internet-based platforms, many voices on the dissident right are trying to claim that it's only right-wingers, conservatives and libertarians who are the ones on the receiving end of this censorship, demonetization and de-platforming frenzy being carried out by Big Tech giants like Google, Facebook, Twitter, Paypal, and now even smaller tech companies like Patreon.

What the independent-right content creators are ignoring is the fact that independent creators on the left are getting it big time as well. I've heard plenty of stories about Progressive Facebook pages being taken down, their videos being shadowbanned or removed altogether, and all other sorts of shady censorship shenanigans the Zuck machine has been pulling. In the video Below, Jimmy Dore (one of the few voices on the left today whom I find tolerable) has on as a guest a young anti-establishment Progressive media activist whom Facebook has majorly censored.



So we know this is not a conspiracy to stuff out conservative voices online, but rather a coordinated effort to harass and scare off ALL independent political commentators off the big platforms. The reason why Big Tech is doing this is painfully obvious and shouldn't have to be explained. But to be brief: Any and all political commentary that doesn't 100% shill for the oligarch-establishment narrative is seen as an existential threat to the establishment. What they're particularly scared about is that independent media appeals to a much younger demographic than the god-awful Corporate Propaganda-spewing MSM (Mainstream Media) can ever hope to garner. MSM networks are the dinosaur media and they're left with a rapidly-aging and dying audience. I believe the average age of CNN viewers hovers somewhere around 70. Ouch. Other corporate networks like Fox and MSNBC aren't faring much better. And of course the dinosaur alphabet networks like CBS, NBC and ABC all have geriatric audiences as far as their news programming is concerned. Tune into the hyper-vacuous "Nightly News" on any one of those networks and wait until commercial time; they're all pharmaceutical ads. This is a telltale sign that the primary viewing demographic is on death's door. And look at the big-name news personalities these networks have been keeping around for years; many of them are geriatric as well. Many of the best-known news magazine "journalists" (think of shows like 60 Minutes) work on-air until the day they die. Take everything I said above and see how all of these facts together fail to present a very appealing face to younger audiences.

In a nutshell: with ubiquitous high-speed internet, we information consumers now have a seemingly-infinite amount of choice. The old limitations of broadcast bands and cable channel slots are now totally irrelevant. The internet is now the equivalent of what the printing press was in 16th century Europe. Young people don't want to watch an incestuous gaggle of grey-haired, Washington-insider (Deep State) media pundits spinning stupid establishment narratives that no truly-intelligent person falls for any longer. The establishment must know this in the back of their hive mind (I'm being a bit hyperbolic here) and as a result, are in censorship-happy panic mode. But of course, overt censorship just ends up revealing their hand even more to those who are actually paying attention. This won't end well for them unless they figure out a way to adapt to the rapidly-shifting cultural paradigm.

In summary, the establishment oligarchy and their mega corporations are coming after every new media voice who pushes a competing narrative to that of their own. And it's not the fringe voices they care so much about; they love keeping a few alt-right idiots around as a convenient boogeyman to scare the sheep. Like wise, the horde of screeching SJWs and anarcho-crazies (ANTIFA goons) are quite convenient for the elites as well, as they provide an inexhaustible supply of red meat to distract and enrage the dissident right. The voices the establishment really finds to be a threat are those commentators closer to the middle; the ones who offer sane and rational anti-establishment content. People like Sargon of Akkad, Tim Pool, Styxhexenhammer666, Computing Forever, ect., are the real threats; they are the commentators best equipped to steer normies away from establishment narratives. They'll be coming for Tim next, but he's super careful and meticulous about everything he puts out, so if the Big Tech giants does nab him for some tiny little technicality, it will look supremely awful for them. Who knows what'll happen though. My best guess is that it's going to get worse before it gets better.
causticus: trees (Default)
Let's not mince words here; Facebook and Twitter are both unethical as all hell and monopolistic to the bone (which big corp isn't???). But, in my humble view, they are not the worst of Big Tech. I'd say that unholy award goes to Google and Apple. After all, no one has to to through Facebook or Twitter to access the internet.

So why Google and Apple? Because those two megacorps are now collectively THE gatekeeper of the internet. And it's the mobile paradigm which enabled this sorry state of affairs to come about. Those who have so short-sightedly shifted their primary internet usage to mobile devices are now subjects of the App Story Duopoly of Google (Android) and Apple (iOS). Those two giants are now effectively gatekeepers of the entire mobile internet; both of them can decide exactly which apps are and aren't allowed for users to download and use. Sure, on Android devices users can opt to use third party apps and app stores, but by doing so they're opening up themselves to a lot of malware risks, and besides that, most "normie user" (i.e. the non-tech-saavy multitudes)can't be bothered with wandering off the plantation that is the theme-park-style basic usability of their devices. But I digress. Apple and Google are judge, jury and executioner of everything mobile.

The best thing we can hope for in the US at this point is significant anti-trust legislation (not holding my breath here) that would effectively dissolve GoogleApple's app store juggernaut. Meanwhile, those of us who actually give a damn about internet freedom can stick to using desktop devices (i.e. PCs, laptops, ect.) for the bulk of our internet needs. IMHO, mobile devices should never be relied upon for anything beyond quick on-the-go conveniences while away from the home or office, but that is neither here no there.
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 02:42 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios