causticus: trees (Default)
Note: the following is from an archived web page. In other words, I am not the author of this. However I thought it would be nice to mirror this chronology here, as it quite well demonstrates up close how the mess of epic proportions known as Constantinian-Pauline-Abrahamism gradually/incrementally unfolded and metastasized.

Beginning of text:

The idea that Christians persecuted Pagans is a fairly new one in the world of scholarship. Ramsay MacMullen dates its inception to 1986 with Noethlichs and says that “Christian readiness for action carried to no matter what extremes has not always received the acknowledgment it deserves in modern accounts of the period” and that “prior to the 1980s, readers will be hard put to find Firmicus’ word ‘persecution’ describing the conduct of the Christian empire toward its non-Christian subjects.” He notes that R.M. Price in 1993 attributes the “’absence of continuous religious strife’ to ‘a general determination in Late Roman society to minimize the divisiveness of religious differences’ (yes, by extermination).” It is almost a certainty that most Christians are unaware of this process of genocide carried out by their religion.[1]

In the end, neither alleged (but wholly mythical) social egalitarianism nor thirst for a superior religious experience drove conversion in the fourth century; fear did. Ramsay MacMullen has noted the penalties and incentives used by the Christian authorities to speed conversion:
Government…at the urging of the bishops weighed in with threats, and more than threats, of fines, confiscation, exile, imprisonment,flogging, torture, beheading, and crucifixion. What more could be imagined? Nothing. The extremes of conceivable pressure were brought to bear. Thus, over the course of many centuries, compliance was eventually secured and the empire made Christian in truth.[2]
What this list demonstrates is not only the long history of persecution of ethnic religion in the Christian Roman Empire, but also the enduring nature of Paganism in the face of these persecutions.

Note: This list is incomplete and will continue to be updated. It is also limited to the persecution of classical Mediterranean Paganism; it does not begin to address the genocide of European Paganism after the fall of the Western Roman Empire.

All dates given are C.E. (Common Era). Permission is granted to reproduce this table by the author so long as authorship remains intact.

Read more... )
causticus: trees (Default)
By: Xōtlos Mizathtēlos

Because Neo-Paganism and New-Age in general is a largely western phenomenon, it has baggage from Christian thought, Premodern Christianity had an extreme focus on ideas like "Original Sin" and over-focused on Expiation, forgiveness etc as well nonesense like "One True Faith", extreme dogmatic fideism etc. As a result, New Age religion seems to (in reaction) reject any idea of Sin as well as any conception of Dogma or even Truth. With this, it became a huge "no-judge" zone, where anyone could do anything, as long as it made them "happy". Which is itself, a result of misinterpretations of Ancient "Western", Eastern and Abrahamic conceptions of "peace" and/or esctactic union with the Divine.

Which leads to my next point: if you deny any truth and replace it with being "happy", then you essentially replace the Gods with "positive energy". The only Dogma of New Age spirituality is "don't hurt my feelings". Which drove conversation away from Truth and towards personal pleasure, personal pleasure at any cost, even if it means covering your eyes and shouting "lalalalalalala".

All of this was pushed further, by the Egoism of many New Age practitioners, who reduce all spirituality to some lower psychological "sub-conscious" thing. Which makes the source of all understanding of the Gods, the Ego. Thus, the will of the Gods is not based on Higher Principle, but instead on the whims of the Ego, and is driven not towards Unity with the Gods, but towards pleasure and "happiness". (None of this is to speak on the actual teachings of most of the early New-Agers, which were often the opposite of such a self centered world view)

I should state, I am not pro-dogmatic fideism. I am also not an enemy of happiness or psychological interpretations of the Divine. I just recognize these that there is a truth beyond the subjective experience of the Ego.
causticus: trees (Default)
Someone I had been conversing with somewhere else on the internet brought up the question of why are there practically no pagan temples in the West today? Presumably he's asking why there are few, if any, despite the fact that there are sizable numbers of people who identify as pagan?

Pagans need Temples too

Most who read the things I write here can figure out quickly I'm no Christian. I was until I was 17. I left for many reasons. Though an incident at the church gave things a big push lets leave it at that. I still respect those that worship their religion. I just no longer walk that path and I turn to worship the gods of my ancient ancestors. Not any particular faith mind you I lean to the Greek and Viking gods the most. I like Celt and Wiccan as well.

A jack of all... Faiths?

However, I have noticed those that follow these beliefs don't have a place of worship.

A devoted Temple if you will.

Catholics, Jewish Muslims, Christians, Hindus, and even Buddhists have Temples and even get tax exemptions. But never those of Pagan followings. Druids I think are the only recognized religion so far by the united kingdom but that's it I believe. Term Pagan itself was made up by Christians as a blanket term for any group that didn't believe in their religion. That being said I highly doubt they many nations would allow a Pagan Temple to be set up anywhere. Even here in the U.S.A., it seems that we can't have a place to be safe from judgment and worship our gods freely without being called a cult or "Idol worshipers". Even told that it's a dangerous idea.

Why?

You're allowed to build Cathedrals and churches for your "God" why not us. Why can't we build a temple and statues of our heroes? For the most part Wiccan, Druid, and most earth-based religions are fine with being close to nature setting up shines in forest and fields. Their temples would be perfect in a greenhouse. I picture Hellenist(Grecian Gods) would set up in a greenhouse or farm to worship Demeter she is a goddess of the harvest after all. It would be very fitting. She one had large Temples devoted to her as did all the greek gods in ancient times.

Not anymore, the old temples are now nothing more the crumbling ruins.

One of my readers ask me if I would want to see a project were temple to serve as a place of worship for a pagan religion. I think it would be a good thing and should be considered.

I love to see a temple to the old gods to be built. That would be fair right? I'd build one in America as well as Europe maybe even Brittian and Germany.

After all, We have in the Constitutional a right to worship any religion we wish.

I that's true then Pagans have to same rights as anyone else to build places for our gods and goddess as well. What do you think? Even the leftist crazy death cult have a place here why not us?

It's long past time of Pagans to reclaimed our right for a place worship as well.




Yes, I certainly agree that it would be nice if people who identified as Pagan had their own public places of worship. In an ideal world, yes. But of course we are speaking in terms of shoulds rather than what is practically possible right now. Aspirational sentiments can serve as a good rallying cries but we have to balance this with reality.

Firstly, the idea that Neopagans somehow lack the civil rights necessary to build their own temples seems rather silly and divorced from reality. Absolutely nothing beyond the lack of funds and organization is preventing any self-identified pagan from establishing a religious site (here in the US at least. For Americans, it's not so much an issue of lacking the rights to build one, but rather it's the fact that pagans living an any particular local area are so few in numbers and so fragmented into different brands of neopaganism, i.e. Heathenry, Wicca, Hellenism, Druidry, ect. This state of organizational disarray really hard to form cohesive local communities based around any kind of general "pagan" identity, much less unified mode of worship or ritualism that a temple service would require. In my view, a solid community with a set of shared standards is a prerequisite for pagan religious institutions to become a thing. Yes, some degree of institutionalization is needed for very expensive projects like physical edifices (temples) to be possible.

Secondly, I think we need to differentiate the religious congregation of a confessional creed (like an Abrahamic religion) from that of actual/historical polytheistic institutions. The pagan temples of classical antiquity were pretty much civic in nature; and this is because they were civic extensions of the whole society. Each temple would serve a different civic function. These weren't places where popular congregations would gather for community-building or moralistic purposes. The Judeo-Christian concept of a religious congregation would have been a foreign concept in pre-Abrahamic societies. Actual pagan worship and practice for the common person was done in the home, like the Roman Lares (hearth altar).

On the topic of institutionalizing neopaganism, frankly, I don't really see the neopagan movement growing much in the coming years; in fact it will likely stagnate and possibly contract. Much of this is due to the fact that the focus of mass culture right now is on politics and away from spirituality/religion, and it will likely continue like this for the next decade or so. And secondly, (in my view) much of the neopagan movement has simply been a lifestyle accessory expression for the usual secular-leftist-progressive types who have used paganism as a means of rebelling against their Christian upbringings. And now there's a huge backlash against progressivism that will only grow stronger and those who do re-embrace religion will likely opt for going back to Church, even if their religiosity is shallow and done mostly for political reasons; but sure some will go pagan or take up an Eastern religion. I think broadly, the moral void will be filled by people veering away from secular materialism and embracing what's already out there and well-established as far as religion is concerned.

In summary, I don't think the establishment of pagan temples will really become a viable endeavor anytime soon. The mere mention of this wish immediately raises the obvious question: Just who will fund such an expensive endeavor? Maybe when there are neopagan billionaires and multi-millionaires out there, a few of them might decide to kick in the funds and build a few temples, even if these are just vanity projects.

And finally, the idea that building a temple is something that starts a community is putting the cart before the horse. Remember that long before there were physical temples, people largely practices their natural religions in open outdoor spaces and in their homes. Dedicated pagans today can set up worship spaces in their living rooms and then invite their local pagan friends over periodically for something resembling an official service or whatnot. Remember that the first Christian congregations took place in catacombs, cellars, private homes and other discrete locations. It was only when Christian communities grew to critical mass size that the resources became available for the construction of physical churches.
causticus: trees (Default)
Shining One, how many try and snuff out my torch!
How many dark clouds gather around me!
So many are saying of me,
“The Path of Light is but a fool's errand!”

But your power, Shining Lord, is my shield,
Glorious Halo, the Invincible Sun who lifts my head to lofty heights.
I call out to the Shining One,
and He answers me through his rays from up high.

I lie down and sleep;
I wake up and rise again because the Shining One sustains me.
I still radiate despite the thunderous clamor of those dark clouds;
I fear not the howling winds that assail me on every side.

Arise, Shining Lord!
Deliver me, O Invincible Sun!
Dissolve that insolent storm with your brilliant light;
Temper the wicked winds and shrink them down to a caressing breeze.

From the Shining Lord comes deliverance.
May you bless all of those who earnestly seek You out.
causticus: trees (Default)
1. First and foremost, Neopagan revival movements are not rooted in the ancient traditions their proponents claim to be reviving. Obviously, we all know that in Europe (among other places), the old pagan traditions were all-but wiped out by the aggressive and persistent spread of Christianity. At best, these Neopagan endeavors are reconstruction efforts; and ones based on fragments of surviving folklore, writings and ritual practices. The best we have today in terms of surviving retirements are the Greek and Roman traditions of the classical Mediterranean world. Whereas, Northern and Western European traditions are far more scant in terms of surviving literary works and artifacts we have to draw from.

2. Fortunately, the esoteric knowledge and practices of ancient traditions can be “recovered” to some degree by those who know how to do so. I won't really go into this here, but I'll just say that it is theoretically possible. Let's just say if the gods and goddesses are real, in one form or another, then they haven't actually gone anywhere just because human populations on Earth stopped actively venerating them for a period of time. If mystics and occultists today can make contact with deities then it should be theoretically possible to re-kindle the old flames.

3. The main problem today though is that a large number of self-professed Neopagans don't actually believe in the existence of their gods; or at least they don't believe their gods being anything more than mere psychological symbols or linguistic constructs. Nor are Neopagans today (by and large) adequately (or at all!) skilled in the arcane or mystical arts. And thus the τέχνη required for properly understanding and interacting with divine phenomena is largely absent.

4. Because of this (by and large) lack of connection with the higher planes, Neopaganism in the West is largely a mere escapist or alternative lifestyle; one among many others. And because of this, Neopagnaism tends to disproportionately attract society's misfits, the maladjusted, eccentrics and weird people in general. Any movement that fails to attract anything more than a fringe base of support isn't going to become anything beyond a fringe movement. From an Optics perspective, this prevents so-called “normies” from feeling comfortable joining or aligning with the movement in question. Normies tend to go where they see other normies already congregating.

5. Being little more than a mere lifestyle choice, in a crowded market with many other competing lifestyle choices, the choice of affiliation with Neopaganism is mostly driven by motivations and concerns that have little to do with anything inherently spiritual. And thus we can say that most Neopagan endeavors are driven by political beliefs and affiliations. The two most notable factions of Neopagnaism are largely political in nature. These are, (1) New Age Neopaganism, and (2) Folkish Neopaganism.

6. New Age Neopaganism is primarily a product of emancipatory politics (i.e. Leftism) and it's practitioners are what its critics might deride as “fluff bunnies,” among other pejorative labels. Because of its roots in emancipatory politics, this branch of Neopaganism is largely antagonistic toward anything reeking of rules, discipline, authority or firm principles. In other words, its collective mentality is stuck in a permanent state of adolescent rebellion, and as a result, is resistant of any effort to “impose” coherent metaphysical doctrines, principles or structured leadership upon its beliefs and practices. Wicca is the largest and most recognizable system that has emerged under the New Age Neopagan umbrella. Because its rebellion-based ethos, New Age Neopaganism attracts people who harbor quite a bit of animus toward rules, structure and authority. Good luck organizing that! In terms of its beliefs and doctrines, New Age Neopaganism, like New Age thought in general, is largely drawn from second, third and forth hand Theosophical and other late-19th and early-20th century Occult teachings, and the more hands you add, the more bastardized, misunderstood and misapplied those original teachings become. And much of the time these fuzzy teachings are poorly cited (from the original source materials), if at all. After all, asking for proper attribution is oppressive! Finally, we can observe that current-day New Age Neopaganism has almost become totally consumed by the Intersectional Cult (think: the Oppression Olympics) and the moral panic this cult has frantically stirred up among so many quarters of mainstream cultural discourse. As a result, New Age Neopaganism has purity-spiraled into a state of shrill emancipatory identity politics, which has drowned out anything remotely spiritual.

7. If New Age Neopaganism is the “Left wing” if Neopaganism, then Folkish Neopaganism is the “Right wing” of it. As the name alludes to, folkish Neopaganism is mostly concerned with the ethnic identity of the practitioner, and thus is an accessory to ethnic identity politics movements. In Europe and North America, Folkish Neopaganism is taken up by those who could be generalized as White Nationalists and White Identitarians. In other words, white people who reject the multicultural and increasingly globalized and homogenized direction modern Western culture has veered off in. Many of these people might claim to reject modernity as a whole and be for restoring what they imagine to be the Traditionalism of their ancestors. Overtly racist, ethnocentric and antisemitic beliefs are common among Folkish Neopagans (some are even out-and-out Neo Nazis) and of course this elicits an unyielding amount of hyper-furious indignation from the pro-multiculturalist New Age Neopagans. The ideology of Folkish Neopaganism is just about as “postmodern” as that of their Leftist opponents. Folkish Neopagans loosely draw their ideas from the likes the pessimistic “will to power” musings of thinkers like Arthur Schopenhaur and Frederich Nietzsche, and of course the 20th century “Traditionalist” spiritual polemicist Julius Evola (Evola was essentially the spiritual founder of the current-day Alt Right). The Folkish interpretation of Evola's writings tends to lend itself to a sort of naive and reactionary anti-intellectualism; many followers of this line of thought are seriously convinced that philosophy and metaphysical discourse constitutes the “degenerate” stage of a culture. And thus, the only real “solution” is to just...like...go back to being one with nature or something. And this “nature” means re-embracing a long, lost warrior spirit that long ago got snuffed out by the corrupting influences of civilization. Taken to its logical conclusion, this ideology ends up degenerating (to appropriate a term they love to use) into an incoherent mishmash of vaguely-anarcho-primitivst sentimentalism. Really, not so different from the “noble savage” back-to-nature festishism we might find among their New Age Neopagan counterparts.

Conclusion: These two main “wings” of Neopaganism are both largely driven by competing forms of romanticist sentimentalism, as opposed to any coherent set of metaphyscial principles or properly-sourced teachings from time-tested lineages. At some point in the future, I shall propose that Paganism can and should be metaphysical again. Which means that it will be an endeavor that will sit high above the political sphere and all its petty, time-sensitive trappings and distractions.
causticus: trees (Default)
Though my somewhat-intensive studies on the matter (in my own scattered-yet-immersive style), I've found a very close correlation between the sephira spheres on the Kabalistic Tree of Life and the planetary spheres of classical Hermeticism. I actually find sticking to the planetary names and attributes to be more clear and helpful than using the former system.

Here is a diagram of how each of the planets fit into this system in hierarchical order:


A quick disclaimer is in order before proceeding further: The Plolemaic system is meant to be a metaphysical cosmological map, not a literal map of our actual physical solar system. Anyone witha 3rd grade science education knows that the Earth is certainly not the center of the solar system. In other words, the map above is heuristic device used to explain metaphysical principles; it's not the territory itself. We moderns have this knee-jerk impulse to grossly empiricize everything under the sun, to to speak. The ancients didn't really think like this. I've actually run into a few people (in this case, Rene Guenon fanboys) who believe literally in this geocentric model as being our physical reality. They are missing the point of it entirely and are spiritually and mentally consumed by their lower ego and thus have little interest in exploring the mysteries beyond the most superficial level with an open mind and humble heart.

Having gotten all of that out of the way, we can now move into the map itself. In this system, each of the 7 sacred "planets" function as receptors and transmitters of primordial cosmic energies or intelligences (i.e "the gods"), according to the classic Hermetic sciences. There are both higher and lower aspects to the planets, with the lower aspects manifesting when the different planetary energies intersect here on Earth in an inauspicious manner. The highest aspects are the benevolent qualities each planet represents. The hierarchy starts with Earth, but the Earth isn't a planet itself in this scheme, but rather the starting point on our enlightenment journey. The basic outline, in order:

Moon (Luna/Selene/Diana): Raw intuition and creativity, also the reception of all the other planetary energies and the transmission of them down to Earth. Associated with the Water element. Luna is the first step on the enlightenment path; it's the initial "wake-up call." The lower nature of the Lunar sphere consists of things like neuroticism, mental incontinence and even insanity, hence the word "Lunatic." The person who fails to pass the Lunar sphere is the person dominated by their unconscious mind; they run most of the time on autopilot and have difficulty exerting agency over their own affairs. In the world of art, Luna is the raw creativity. It's the Solar power (Apollo) which gives art its useful and inspiring form.

Mercury (Hermes/Thoth): Messenger of the gods and associated with the Air element. More specifically, this sphere represents the communicative and flexible powers of nature. Mercury is the power of intellect and thus the ability to understand higher wisdom/teachings within a coherent intellectual framework. Passing this sphere requires the ability to think clearly and rationally. However, remaining stuck in Mercury means the initiate cannot surpass the act of merely intellectualizing higher wisdom; without the ability to master the next sphere (Venus), the initiate will still be driven by emotional impulses, passions and desires. The "master debater" sophist, the legalistic pharisee and the arrogant professor are all potent archetypes for this type of Mercurial arrested development. The lower/malign aspect of Mercury manifests in the various misuses of the intellect that bring much harm and misfortune to others. Tricksters, con-artists and clever liars in general, are all archetypal associations of the dark side of Mercury.

Venus (Aurora/Aphrodite): Goddess of love and bonding. Venus represents the passions and the emotional side of human nature. Lower aspects are our lusts and animalistic appetites of an emotional nature. Passing this sphere requires the ability of the initiate to master his or her own emotions. Failing to pass the Venus sphere means we are still slaves to our emotions. Esoterically, the Venus sphere is the principle of attraction. It's associated with the element of Fire, but this fire is "flowing" and persistent, as opposed to the arid fire of Mars, which simply consumes things and ceases when that consumption process is complete. Venusian fire lingers until its actively dissipated or the burning energy moves onto someone or something else. Think of Venus as heat in a humid medium, say an environment like a tropical beach. Whereas, Mars is a desert environment.

Sun (Sol/Apollo): Represents the heroic and healing role the initiate will embody on his or her path. The Sun is the giver of life and energy. It represents vitalistic activity and energetic manifestation in general. A saintly person or a true altruist is the type of person who has mastered the Solar sphere. The Solar hero is truly a "son of God" if we're to understand what that means beyond all the trite platitudes which have been associated with that symbolism over the past many centuries. Solar Savior figures are clear representations of the Sun archetype when applied to the actions of sentient beings. The Sun is also a symbolization of Celestial Fire in an apparent form that humans can make sense of.

Mars (Pyroeis/Ares): Mars is the god of war, in the most superficial sense. However, on a more primal and esoteric level, the Martial sphere represents the harsh and unyielding Judgement aspect of the enlightenment path that must be mastered before ultimately breaking free of one's earthly fetters; it's raw willpower. Whereas Jupiter is the benevolent Sage or Hierophant capable of practicing genuine Mercy, Mars is the series of trials and tribulations that must be passed before the hero can truly become an enlightened master. Really, there's no Mercy without Judgement. Martial activities and endeavors are quite self-explanatory. Mars is a fundamentally male energy and thus its essence is supremely cut-and-dry and lacking in nuance. Whereas Venus, the mundane female energy, is a tangled web of ebbs and flows, meandering curvatures, and convoluted nuances.

Jupiter (Zeus/Jove): This sphere has been subject to a whole host of misunderstandings largely due to the fact that various sky gods also functioning as pantheon heads have been associated with this sphere without much in the way of finer explanations being offered. To clear up this confusion we should defer to the Indian understanding of what Jupiter represents. The Hindu shorthand term for this sphere is "Guru." The benevolent and wise teacher (or Hierophant) is the true essence of this sphere. The mundane aspect of Jupiter is fortune and prosperity; think of the word "Jovial" as an example. Combine this with its kabalistic association with Mercy, which can only really be attained once Judgement is mastered. Plato's concept of the Philosopher-King may perhaps be the best characterization of the aggregate sum of what this sphere has to offer.

Saturn (Kronos/Rhea): This oft-maligned planet represents the constrictive and limiting aspects of nature. It's associated with the Earth element and thus the Saturn symbolism of things like blockages, obstructions, austerity, restrictions, conservatism, stodginess, caution, rigidity, old age, slowness, stubbornness, the act of thwarting or stymieing, ect., easily comes to mind. If Mars is the sword in battle, then Saturn is the shield. If Mars is the accelerator on a car, then Saturn is the brakes. In essence, the Saturn energy is the final gatekeeper of this manifested universe of limitations, sorrow, troubles, death, ignorance, disaster, destruction, ect. We could perhaps say that Saturn is the Ouroboros (the serpent who eats its own tail) or the Wheel of Fate/Samsara. Saturn is the final tests before a soul can truly gain immortality of consciousness and escape the cycle of death and rebirth. At this stage, the initiate will have transcended all of their worldly desires and thus have balanced out all of their karmic debts. The highest aspect of the Saturn sphere is the Great Mother Goddess, which is the primordial energy that gives form and solidity to everything in manifested existence. Many of the Neolithic and Bronze Age serpent cults understood this symbolism quite intuitively.

The functions on this chart higher than Saturn constitute a whole different topic for another time.
causticus: trees (Default)
Just a quick rant here (don't expect coherence or logical flow). Anyway, I'm jotting down some notes regarding my observations and interactions with people who claim to be Neopagans or "heathens" or whatever other label a person of that persuasion might affix to themselves.

Probably owing to how small/fringe/marginal Neopaganism is, there hasn't yet been any sort of substantial intellectual culture that has sprung from any of its various subdivisions. And yes, emphasis on subdivisions. Since efforts at reviving pagan traditions tends to focus on one specific (and long-lost) ethnic tradition, there's very little coordination or cooperation between these various endeavors, and thus no unity. The closest thing we have to a unified doctrine is Wicca, which isn't at all based on a real historical tradition; a British Neo-occultist made the whole thing up out of thin air during the mid 20th century ara. I've heard Wicca described as "Christianity with boobs," and I'm inclined to largely agree with that assessment. Wicca has more to do with the Victorian occult counterculture than it does with anything related to the religious/spiritual practices of prehistorical Western European peoples.

Anyway, because of this massive amount of disunity and splintering among the Neopagan community, it's quite difficult to formulate a singular "Neopagan" metaphysical system; any such effort would come from one of the groups and this could easily be seen as one group attempting to impose a rigid doctrine on all the other groups. Yeah, most Neopagans are (rightfully) pretty sore about what Christianity has done various native religious traditions for many centuries; a big reason they become "pagans" is to escape from all of that while being able to maintain some kind of spiritual worldview.

Of course when we actually examine the history of pagan cultures, states, empires, ect., we see a vastly different picture painted. Pantheons were often consolidations of various ethnic traditions. And philosophy, particularly in Greco-Roman civilization, did indeed produce several attempts to formulate an all-encompassing metaphysical system using the Hellenistic (Greco-Roman) pantheon as a thematic backdrop, combined with Mesopotamian (Chaldean) astrotheology and Egyptian emanation models. This is precisely what the Eclectic School during lately antiquity did, though modern historians generalize this movement as "Neoplatonism." The Eclectic movement led to yes, Neoplatonism, but also similar movements/doctrines we know today mainly as Gnosticism and Hemeticism. And oh yeah, I shall not fail to also mention the 900 lb. gorilla in the room, that is Christianity, which was really the grand state-approved product of Hellenistic eclecticism.

So yes, once upon a time "paganism" was indeed supremely philosophical. But the historical traditions most Western Neopagans today draw upon is whatever can be cobbled together from the scattered remnants of pre-Christian Germanic and Celtic tribal folklore. These traditions were never the traditions of great civilizations (it requires urbanized societies to develop deep thought on metaphysical matters) and due to the tribal nature of these traditions, they were each fractured into sub-traditions and local docrtines according each small/local tribal division. And of course, folklore itself isn't a whole or intact religious tradition. From my own interactions with Neopagans, I've come under the impression that many are just fine with pretending that fragmentary knowledge of folklore is enough for a reconstruction effort. Many of these people I suspect to actually be atheists, agnostics, or maybe vague pantheists if they actually hold something resembling a spiritual worldview. But many are just people alienated from their Christian upbringing and looking for something spiritual-y to be a part of. And then there's some who use Neopaganism as a method means of engaging in ethnonationalist identity politics. I'm thinking particularly of White Identitarians who take up the mantle of "Heathenry" (Germanic/Norse Neopaganism)as a way of expressing their (imagined) ethic identity, i.e. something along the lines of "We Wuz Vikangz." These people generally call themselves Folkish Heathens. Of course there are many Neo-Heathens who shun ethnic identity politics and practice an inclusive version of Heathenry; I would be doing a massive injustice if I failed to mention the folks who are actually the majority of the Neo-Heathen movement. Anyway, regarding the Folkish Heathens, I quickly discovered upon interacting with some of them, that they seem largely hostile to philosophy or anything all the intellectual. Their heathenry is largely about expressing their emotions and desire to form tight-knit ethnic cliques adorned with the same gang colors and regalia. BTW, I have nothing against ethnic solidarity itself, I just think groups who take up that cause tend to be quite hostile to cosmopolitan (in the true sense of the word) endeavors like philosophy. As we know, the goal of philosophy is to get at and unveil universal truths.

If Neopagans are to be philosophical and united in any way, then the next logical step would be to revive the great pagan philosophical schools which formed the underpinnings of Western thought to begin with. This is really a no-brainier. The Western Esoteric Tradition, i.e. Hermetic, which is really just the aforementioned Eclectic School of late antiquity, can easily be flavored with the various godforms (i.e. old gods and goddesses interpreted as ideal forms or archetypes) of whatever folklore traditions can be incorporated into the whole. There's even been some pretty substantial efforts to inject metaphysics into the Nordic Rune system. That was a great start, now let's see if it can be taken further.
causticus: trees (Default)
Here is an interesting article news story that caught my eyes earlier today. It's about US Navy sailors who hold religious services rooted in Norse paganism aboard aircraft carrier.

Heathenry is experiencing a resurgence.

The polytheistic religion, one that traces its origin to Norse myths that tell of the universe’s creation and prophesy its destructive end, was at one time stifled following the end of the Viking Age and the subsequent spread of Christianity.

One such collections of myths, “The Prose Edda” — authored by Icelandic historian and politician Snorri Sturluson sometime around the year 1220 — provides much of what the modern world knows about Norse mythology: Yggdrasil, Asgard and the Aesir, a tribe of gods and goddesses with names like Odin, Thor, Loki, Frigg and Idun.

Now, nearly 800 years after Sturluson’s “Edda,” a small group of sailors aboard the aircraft carrier John C. Stennis has adopted these deities as the pillars of their religion, according to a Navy release.


My only opinion on this is simply, good for them! Anyway, the comment reactions to this story from shrieking ('autistic screeching' in 4chan parlance) evangelical Christians were pretty entertaining and entirely predictable. The responses fall along the lines of:

1. See, this is evidence of Satantic cults everywhere; the spiritual war is real!
2. Those evil and depraved heathens are probably sacrificing children!!!
3. Who needs old superstitious Norse mythology when we have Jesus to save us from our sins???

My response to these sentiments:

1. Yeah, just a couple decades ago you idiots were claiming that Dungeons % Dragons and heavy metal music were nothing but fronts for secret "Satan" worship. [Fallacy: ANYTHING THAT ISN'T EXACTLY MY RELIGIOUS BELIEFS IS EVIL/SATANIC/DEPRAVED/BLASPHEMOUS]
2. Dude, your entire religion revolves around human sacrifice. Glass houses, glass houses. [PROJECTION]
3. Ok, so let me get this straight: Norse mythology is just mythology and superstition, whereas Hebrew mythology is scientific fact? Whatever you are smoking, pass it this way. Wait...on second thought, I think I'll pass. [Again, PROJECTION]

I long for the truly old days when we go just each go about our business believing (or not believing) in any variant of whatever mythology or cosmological schema we want to without any real threat of harassment, coercion or character assassination. Maybe fundamentalist Christian will learn their lesson on this now that SJWs are coming for them. Then again, they probably won't learn a damn thing.

Oh well... Hail Odin!
causticus: trees (Default)
I'm much in agreement with this analysis. The OT/Tanakh contains many supremely skewed accounts of the histories. cultural and folkloric practices of various Near Eastern peoples. The book (more like a sprawling corpus) altogether is a political narrative, not an objective study of anything. From TC:
I do not recommend using the Bible for reference when trying to learn about ancient worship practice. The Bible is a mixture of false histories and plagerized [sic] scripture from other civilizations. And the Bible perverts most of what was stolen. Baal is a title not a Gods name, but so you will see many references to Baal because they simply site him by title. So Baal can be different Gods depending on source and context. Even the alleged Yahweh of the Hebrew has seven different names in the old testament and may not always be the same God. The ancient Hebrews were not monotheistic as is commonly taught.

Good point on Baal, which was just a title among the Northwest Semitic peoples (Canaanites) of antiquity; there were a number of deities which contained the name Baal. It translates as something along the lines of "Lord." In other words, it was something rather generic. We find a similar word, "Bel" in Akkadian, which was another ancient Semitic tongue. Idiot conspiracy nuts, usually of the fundamentalists evangelical Protestant persuasion, like to throw around "Baal" as being a name for Satan or whatever. Actually, they believe anything that isn't 100% their version of "God" or Jesus to be Satan. These mouth-breathing sorts know absolutely zilch about history, comparitive religion, philosophy or really anything that's intellectually a single notch above believing in their Bible in the most literal, word-by-word manner.
causticus: trees (Default)
Let's first get the etymological information out of the way:

Jupiter or Iuppiter is a vocative compound derived from the archaic Latin Iovis and pater (Latin for father). Linguistic studies identify the Latin theonym Jupiter as having derived from the phonologically similar proto-Indo-European compound *dyēus- pəter-, which refers to the "Father God," ruler of the daytime sky. This is the very same deity from whom also derives the Sanskrit Dyaus or Dyaus Pita ("Sky Father") of the Vedas, the Germanic *Tiwaz, and of course the Greek Zeus. This word *dyēus- pəter- itself derives from the proto-Indo-European root diu, meaning “bright” or "to shine," referring to the light of the sun and sky in daytime. For the Romans, as well as other mythological systems derived from proto-Indo-European roots such as that of the Vedas and the Norse, the god of the sky was also the supreme god. Thus, the similarity between Jupiter's Latin title and those given to the celestial gods in the Sanskrit, Germanic and Greek languages provides strong linguistic evidence that the god had a connection to the Proto-Indo-European sky god.

Jupiter's alternative title Jove, meanwhile, is an English formation based on Iov-, the stem of oblique cases of the Latin name for the Vedic Dyaus Pita.


It does seem that both Odin and Zeus played a very similar "All-fatherly" role in each respective mythology. But they certainly were not the same figure, not did they represent the same exact archetypal attributes. Zeus/Jupiter was depicted as a grand-regal sky god, whereas Odin was more portrayed as a wizardly god of knowledge.

And then there's the difference in planetary associations. At some point in time, the Greeks and Romans had retrofitted their pantheons into the Babylonian astrotheology schema, thus giving a planetary association to the most major of their deities. For example, Zeus/Jupiter became associated with the literal object in the sky we now all Jupiter, Aphrodite/Venus with the planet Venus, ect. So when the Romans met other peoples (usually by conquest), they would associate the foreign gods with their own by trying to match them up to their own sort of planetary associations. When the Romans made contact with the Germanic peoples, they associated Wotan/Odin with their own Mercury, probably as a snap judgement based on vague observations of shared attributes. However, as far as I know, the Germanic peoples had no such system of associating their gods with specific celestial objects, so to say that "Odin in Mercury" could very much be a gross misrepresentation of that god.



At the end of the day, we can say that Wotan/Odin is a father god and was head of the Norse pantheon (I'm unsure about other Germanic tribes though), but lacked the sky and thunder/lightning attributes of Zeus. In the Germanic system that latter quality was assigned to Thor. So we could say that Zeus is kind of a combination of Odin and Thor. But we can't just correlate two similar gods from different pantheons and say they're both just two different names for the same figure/entity.

Finally, within occult circles we find the idea that Odin is an actual entity somewhere out there in the cosmos; an entity people can learn to communicate with. I won't comment on the potential veracity of such a claim. Anyone reading this can search around on their own for stories and anecdotes that shine more light on this topic.
causticus: trees (Default)
From the very WIDE net I've cast out in the area of comparative religion studies, in a very Sagittarius-rising kind of way, mind you, I've arrived at a concept I have termed "Complete Tradition." By this I mean, a spiritual/religious umbrella that allows for a plurality of different spiritual paths and approaches to metaphysical inquiry and outward religious expression.

Using the framework of Sanatana Dharma (Hinduism), we could say that within a Complete Tradition there are 3 basic Spiritual Paths, or simply, Approaches to the Divine:

1. God-communion
2. Self-realization
3. Nature-communion

1. (God-communion) is the path of direct communion with a deity, typically by way of prayer, mantras and various other devotional activities. The devotee calls upon God using personality-representation or Avatar of the Supreme Being. Hindus worshiping Krishna as the last avatar of Vishnu (Hindu Godhead), is one famous example. The even more famous example would be worshipping Jesus Christ as the incarnation of Yahweh* on Earth. And of course, there's Muslims with Allah. You get the picture. In the Hindu tradition, this devotional path is called Bhakti Yoga, or simply Bhakti. Sometimes Karma Yoga can be combined with this. Worship often has a communal expression and in general this path is suited for people of an emotional or earthly nature; the sort of people who require a group atmosphere and the peer-reinforcement that comes along with that territory. This type of religion can eventually degrade into blind faith, dogma-attachment and even fanaticism. The Age of Pisces (which we are now departing) saw Bhakti religions as the most dominant and widespread. As we enter further into Aquarius, religions that have only allowed for this type of path are either going to shed tons of followers or be forced in one way or another to loosen up on the old dogma and allow for more diverse types of practice and belief.

2. (Self-realization) is another way of connecting with the Absolute Divine, although in a much more individualized manner than the above path. A deity is usually invoked, though this is not totally necessary. The prime Hindu example of this path would be the invocation of Shiva as the representation of Pure Consciousness in its highest form. This path does not at all require any sort of communal religious activity. And thus it's a path well suited to monks, hermits, and renunciates in general. And for those who aren't willing to entirely give up mundane worldly life, this can simply be a path of individual worship or practice for a householder. In essence, it's the perfect path of the "spiritual but not religious" type who might be averse to group activities or rigid dogma. In a more degraded form, the Self-realization path becomes the so-called "Left Hand Path" taken by the casual (or serious) dabbler in the Occult who still believes in a power or powers much higher than the material plane. Whether an occultist, heterodox practitioner, or loner adherent of an established tradition, the Self-realization path is suited toward the person who is considerably more experimental, eclectic, enterprising or intellectual than the average person. Various types of Yoga are geared toward this path. In summary, Self-realization is how the seeker discovers the divinity of their own consciousness and eventually the transcendent Oneness of all reality.

3. (Nature-communion) is what we get when we think of popular conceptions of Paganism, Witchcraft, Shamanism and Native American spirituality. This is a set of myriad and diverse practices and ritual forms used to connect with unseen** forces of nature in a very local context (as in, in your own bio-region here on Earth), typically phenomena like nature spirits/elementals, terrestrial devas, planetary energies, telluric spirits, demons, ghosts, departed souls, ancestor spirits, ect. Or this is simply the exploration of paranormal phenomena.

Of course, any serious (and relatively-unbiased) scholar might conclude that the actual ancient pagan traditions had this path merely as a part of their outer forms, and that within these traditions were metaphysical teachings and spiritual practices that certainly included many aspects of the first two paths. The most famous example of this is the Hellenistic (Greco-Roman) tradition, which like Sanatana Dharma wasn't a singular religion at all, but rather an expansive cultural umbrella containing myriad cults, practices and teachings. In fact this is what ALL pagan traditions really were -- not any specific "ism" but actually that very umbrella. Most Monotheists have difficulty conceptualizing their concept of "paganism" in these broad, nuanced terms. And thus they treat it like a creed they need to denounce, because all they know of religion and spirituality is precisely-written creeds. To use an old cliche here: When your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. One of the hallmark practices of Abrahamism was to treat all Nature-communion spirituality as "devil worship," and idolatry, because of the rather ambiguous nature of the countless spiritual entities that are neither angels nor infernal beings. With this rigid type of dualism, any non-human sentient entity with a neutral-leaning alignment generates an immediate "does not compute!" result and thus gets cast into the "demon" bin because it can't be accurately classified within the tone-deaf dualist schema. The more mature way of looking at path#3 is to realistically see it as only being able to go "so far"... in other words, only leading slightly up the mountain, yet serving as a potent entry point to the transcendent paths that go far higher. IMHO, Nature-communion is a good way to introduce skeptical personality types*** to the realm of spirituality. But the seeker must be informed of all the potential pitfalls native to this path.


------

*Yahweh is the Hebrew God of the Torah, originally one among the whole Northwest Semitic pantheon. Eventually, with the rapid spread of Christianity, the Romans ended up passing off this god as universal when they mass-adopted the religion and made it their one-and-only state religion, and thus conflated what was once just a tribal god with The Good/Absolute principle of the Platonic and Gnostic traditions. Several centuries later, Jewish kabbalists would incorporate the Platonic Godhead into their own system in a much more holistic and sensible manner and created a Hebrew metaphysical doctrine far more elaborate (and in line with Perennial tradition) than the confusing hodgepodge known as Christian theology. By the medieval period, the YHWH (Tetragrammaton) of Kabbalah became synonymous with the Platonic, Gnostic and Eastern (Dharmic) concepts of the transcendent God.

**Unseen by those lacking in psychic and clairvoyant faculties. According to most traditions that are inclusive of the third path, these are abilities that a practitioner can develop and augment over time with much practice, determination and instruction from a competent and knowledgeable teacher.

***Skeptical personality types, meaning people who in this context lack faith in divine providence, yet harbor an intellectual curiosity in the paranormal and are thus willing to explore this area in an experimental manner.
causticus: trees (Default)
The short answer is that we don't really know for sure. And that modern attempts to reconstruct this lost tradition are always going to be based on modern assumptions and opinions rather than anything genuinely representing the ancient Celtic wordlview.

The problem we have with ascertaining authentic ancient Celtic beliefs and praxis basically boils down to:

(1) Lack of primary sources from the Celtic point of view due to both the wholesale Roman conquest of Celtic territories and the fact that Celtic spirituality was an oral tradition; very little was written down.

(2) Highly-biased second and third hand accounts of their beliefs and practices from parties who were rather hostile to (or just ignorant of) Celtic traditions.

(3) The fact that at their peak, the Celts were not a single nation or centralized political entity, but rather a continuum of various tribal groups and confederations that spanned a rather large geographic reach. And owing to this decentralized arrangement, there would have been quite a variety of differing beliefs and practices found among the varying groups spread out over this vast expanse of land; of course all of this was held together to some degree by the Druid orders which did bring some semblance of coherence to the whole thing, despite the many local differences in religious expression. But let us not pretend for one moment to know what the Druids believed or taught.

The same three points above could applied to other tribal traditions that the Romans wiped out, whether that would have been through direct military conquest or the later-occurring religious conquests of Roman Christianity via its mass conversions of various European peoples.

We can clearly see now why the many attempts at pagan reconstruction today constitutes an ever-precarious endeavor.
Page generated Jun. 19th, 2025 08:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios