This is a concept I've been working on in my head for quite some time. I finally got around to make basic infographic for the purpose of illustrating the basic concept.

Blue box - This is the Abstract and Theoretical part of a religion. It's the core ideas that hold the whole thing together. The greatest of traditions have very elaborate philosophies, cosmologies, and myths. Religions of a more dysfunctional or unbalanced nature tend to have core ideas based on nonsensical dogmas and incoherent philosophical ideas. Some new religious movements, particular the various underwhelming favors of "Neo-paganism" and New Age, are rather weak in this area. Many groups of the former type are outright hostile to the concept of philosophy itself as they tend to be focused almost entirely on aesthetics and alternative lifestyles.
Red box - This is the communal part of religion. It's the rites and festiveness that bring a community together and make the religion-in-question a truly living (and lived!) tradition. One could argue that a religion or spiritual system without much in the way of this component is in fact not a religion at all. A religion with no communal aspect will have a lot of difficulty gaining support and patronage from the broader community it exists within.
Green box - All of the great traditions come from a specific people/culture inhabiting a specific place or geographical region. Many of the aesthetic part of a religion come from the land where the religion first emerged from. The so-called "pagan" religions are the strongest in this area by far. And the many missionary/prophetic religions tend to be the weakest in this respect, as these religions are heavily weighted toward abstract ideas and aspirations (Blue box). We could say that a religion totally cut off from the land is an unbalanced religion.
Orange box - This is what merges spirituality into religion. The greatest religions have systems of personal/individual practice which adherent/practitioners can utilize to do things like cultivate virtue/merit, purify their soul, raise their consciousness level, ect. Very dogmatic religions tend to be quite weak in this area, as the authorities who run those religions tend to view personal spiritual practice with a lot of suspicion, seeing as individuals who cultivate various attainments tend to become a lot more qualified experts on religion and spirituality than the authorities. At the same time, a lot new religious movements tend to be too heavily weighted in this area, as the movement focuses a lot on personal development and very little on developing philosophical ideas, caring much about any specific local place, or interacting with the broader community.

Blue box - This is the Abstract and Theoretical part of a religion. It's the core ideas that hold the whole thing together. The greatest of traditions have very elaborate philosophies, cosmologies, and myths. Religions of a more dysfunctional or unbalanced nature tend to have core ideas based on nonsensical dogmas and incoherent philosophical ideas. Some new religious movements, particular the various underwhelming favors of "Neo-paganism" and New Age, are rather weak in this area. Many groups of the former type are outright hostile to the concept of philosophy itself as they tend to be focused almost entirely on aesthetics and alternative lifestyles.
Red box - This is the communal part of religion. It's the rites and festiveness that bring a community together and make the religion-in-question a truly living (and lived!) tradition. One could argue that a religion or spiritual system without much in the way of this component is in fact not a religion at all. A religion with no communal aspect will have a lot of difficulty gaining support and patronage from the broader community it exists within.
Green box - All of the great traditions come from a specific people/culture inhabiting a specific place or geographical region. Many of the aesthetic part of a religion come from the land where the religion first emerged from. The so-called "pagan" religions are the strongest in this area by far. And the many missionary/prophetic religions tend to be the weakest in this respect, as these religions are heavily weighted toward abstract ideas and aspirations (Blue box). We could say that a religion totally cut off from the land is an unbalanced religion.
Orange box - This is what merges spirituality into religion. The greatest religions have systems of personal/individual practice which adherent/practitioners can utilize to do things like cultivate virtue/merit, purify their soul, raise their consciousness level, ect. Very dogmatic religions tend to be quite weak in this area, as the authorities who run those religions tend to view personal spiritual practice with a lot of suspicion, seeing as individuals who cultivate various attainments tend to become a lot more qualified experts on religion and spirituality than the authorities. At the same time, a lot new religious movements tend to be too heavily weighted in this area, as the movement focuses a lot on personal development and very little on developing philosophical ideas, caring much about any specific local place, or interacting with the broader community.